On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:02:12 +0100
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:17:48AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> > > the s390-specific implementation because of the
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:02:12 +0100
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:17:48AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> > > the s390-specific implementation because of the
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:17:48AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> > the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
> > In fact, the only difference was calling
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:17:48AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> > the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
> > In fact, the only difference was calling
On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
> In fact, the only difference was calling console_unblank() instead of
> unblank_screen().
>
> The common
On (11/22/18 15:15), Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
> the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
> In fact, the only difference was calling console_unblank() instead of
> unblank_screen().
>
> The common
Please remove the weak attribute from the generic implementation as
well now that the last override is gone.
Please remove the weak attribute from the generic implementation as
well now that the last override is gone.
The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
In fact, the only difference was calling console_unblank() instead of
unblank_screen().
The common implementation in lib/bust_spinlocks.c started to call
The commit cefc8be82403cf ("Consolidate bust_spinlocks()") kept
the s390-specific implementation because of the absence of CONFIG_VT.
In fact, the only difference was calling console_unblank() instead of
unblank_screen().
The common implementation in lib/bust_spinlocks.c started to call
10 matches
Mail list logo