Hi, Greg
Thanks for your kind reply :)
On 2015/12/13 14:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:03AM +0800, xinhui wrote:
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse
Hi, Greg
Thanks for your kind reply :)
On 2015/12/13 14:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:03AM +0800, xinhui wrote:
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:03AM +0800, xinhui wrote:
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
Your "From:" line in the email needs
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:03AM +0800, xinhui wrote:
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
Your
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
---
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
---
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 14 +-
1 files changed, 5
6 matches
Mail list logo