Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dan Aloni wrote: > Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes > in 2.6.24-rc. There is a backported patch already queued in the stable branch. Thanks, tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Dan Aloni wrote: Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. There is a backported patch already queued in the stable branch. Thanks, tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-17 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:26:17AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > > Hello Dan, > >> Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes > >> in 2.6.24-rc. > >> > >> set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, > >> however in

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-17 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:26:17AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: Aristeu Rozanski wrote: Hello Dan, Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, however in 2.6.23, it is called

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Li Zefan
Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > Hello Dan, >> Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes >> in 2.6.24-rc. >> >> set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, >> however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts >> are enabled.

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Aristeu Rozanski
Hello Dan, > Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes > in 2.6.24-rc. > > set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, > however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts > are enabled. This patch ensures that

[PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Dan Aloni
Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts are enabled. This patch ensures that rtc_interrupt() won't

[PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Dan Aloni
Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts are enabled. This patch ensures that rtc_interrupt() won't

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Aristeu Rozanski
Hello Dan, Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts are enabled. This patch ensures that

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix a deadlock in set_rtc_mmss()

2007-11-15 Thread Li Zefan
Aristeu Rozanski wrote: Hello Dan, Patch is valid only for 2.6.23.x, guessing from the recent arch/ changes in 2.6.24-rc. set_rtc_mmss() was used to be called from interrupt context in 2.6.22, however in 2.6.23, it is called from a timer context, where interrupts are enabled. This patch