* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> > > > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
> > > > following behavior:
>
> > > >
* David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/2/13, 10:44 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just
> >>have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same
> >>meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc.
> >
> >Agreed. Maybe we could change
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/2/13, 10:44 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just
have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same
meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc.
Agreed. Maybe we could
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
On 12/2/13, 10:44 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just
have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same
meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc.
Agreed. Maybe we could change it to plain --inherit.
yes:
On 12/2/13, 10:44 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just
have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same
meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc.
Agreed. Maybe we could change it to plain --inherit.
yes:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:24:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> > 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
>> > > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
>> > > following
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:36:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
>> > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
>> > following behavior:
>> >
>> >perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
>> >
>> >
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> > > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
> > > following behavior:
> > >perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
> > >perf
Em Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:05:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> 2013-12-02 (월), 13:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> > * Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > >
> > > It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
> > > normal performance result. To do
* Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
> > following behavior:
> >
> >perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
> >
> >perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
> >
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
> following behavior:
>
>perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
>
>perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
> cycles sleep 1'
>perf report
Hi Ingo,
2013-12-02 (월), 13:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
> * Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > From: Namhyung Kim
> >
> > It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
> > normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
> > time for each evsel and to display it in
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
cycles sleep 1'
perf report # Reports the usual histogram
perf report
* Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim
>
> It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
> normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
> time for each evsel and to display it in the header (--stdio only for
> now).
>
> $ perf record -a sleep
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
time for each evsel and to display it in the header (--stdio only for
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
cycles sleep 1'
perf report # Reports the usual histogram
perf report
Hi Ingo,
2013-12-02 (월), 13:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
time for each
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
cycles sleep 1'
perf report
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e
Em Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:05:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Hi Ingo,
2013-12-02 (월), 13:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
normal
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:36:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
following behavior:
perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1
perf
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:24:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
* Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar:
So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the
From: Namhyung Kim
It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
time for each evsel and to display it in the header (--stdio only for
now).
$ perf record -a sleep 1
$ perf report --stdio
...
#
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
It's sometimes useful to see total sampling or elapsed time with
normal performance result. To do that, record first and last sample
time for each evsel and to display it in the header (--stdio only for
now).
$ perf record -a sleep 1
$ perf report
26 matches
Mail list logo
