Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal/drivers/cpufreq_cooling: Use device name instead of auto-numbering

2021-03-12 Thread Lukasz Luba
Hi Daniel, Only minor comments. On 3/10/21 11:45 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Currently the naming of a cooling device is just a cooling technique followed by a number. When there are multiple cooling devices using the same technique, it is impossible to clearly identify the related device as

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal/drivers/cpufreq_cooling: Use device name instead of auto-numbering

2021-03-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10-03-21, 12:45, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Currently the naming of a cooling device is just a cooling technique > followed by a number. When there are multiple cooling devices using > the same technique, it is impossible to clearly identify the related > device as this one is just a number. > >

[PATCH 1/3] thermal/drivers/cpufreq_cooling: Use device name instead of auto-numbering

2021-03-10 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Currently the naming of a cooling device is just a cooling technique followed by a number. When there are multiple cooling devices using the same technique, it is impossible to clearly identify the related device as this one is just a number. For instance: thermal-cpufreq-0 thermal-cpufreq-1