Re: [PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-15 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:15:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > I assumed from the above that Karol was the author of this patch. Please > let me know if that was wrong. He is - I forgot the From line... Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -

Re: [PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:20:49 -0500 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch removes a variable which was not used in two functions. > Yet another code cleanup, nothing really significant. > > Please note that I could not test this on x86_64. I don't have the > hardware for it. > > [

Re: [PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:20:49 -0500 Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch removes a variable which was not used in two functions. Yet another code cleanup, nothing really significant. Please note that I could not test this on x86_64. I don't have the hardware for it. [ jdike -

Re: [PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-15 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:15:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: I assumed from the above that Karol was the author of this patch. Please let me know if that was wrong. He is - I forgot the From line... Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To

[PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-14 Thread Jeff Dike
This patch removes a variable which was not used in two functions. Yet another code cleanup, nothing really significant. Please note that I could not test this on x86_64. I don't have the hardware for it. [ jdike - Bits of tidying around the affected code. Also, it's fine on x86_64 ]

[PATCH 2/4] UML - Remove unused variables in the context switcher

2007-11-14 Thread Jeff Dike
This patch removes a variable which was not used in two functions. Yet another code cleanup, nothing really significant. Please note that I could not test this on x86_64. I don't have the hardware for it. [ jdike - Bits of tidying around the affected code. Also, it's fine on x86_64 ]