Hi Gavin,
On 2021/3/15 17:56, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Keqian,
>
> On 3/15/21 7:25 PM, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> On 2021/3/15 12:18, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> We needn't retrieve the memory slot again in user_mem_abort() because
>>> the corresponding memory slot has been passed from the caller. This
>> I
Hi Keqian,
On 3/15/21 7:25 PM, Keqian Zhu wrote:
On 2021/3/15 12:18, Gavin Shan wrote:
We needn't retrieve the memory slot again in user_mem_abort() because
the corresponding memory slot has been passed from the caller. This
I think you are right, though fault_ipa will be adjusted when we try
Hi Gavin,
On 2021/3/15 12:18, Gavin Shan wrote:
> We needn't retrieve the memory slot again in user_mem_abort() because
> the corresponding memory slot has been passed from the caller. This
I think you are right, though fault_ipa will be adjusted when we try to use
block mapping,
the
We needn't retrieve the memory slot again in user_mem_abort() because
the corresponding memory slot has been passed from the caller. This
would save some CPU cycles. For example, the time used to write 1GB
memory, which is backed by 2MB hugetlb pages and write-protected, is
dropped by 6.8% from
4 matches
Mail list logo