On 1/13/21 6:36 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Zero out the array of VMCB pointers so that pre_sev_run() won't see
> garbage when querying the array to detect when an SEV ASID is being
> associated with a new VMCB. In practice, reading random values is all
> but guaranteed to be benign as a
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/13/21 6:36 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Zero out the array of VMCB pointers so that pre_sev_run() won't see
> > garbage when querying the array to detect when an SEV ASID is being
> > associated with a new VMCB. In practice, reading random
On 1/13/21 6:36 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Zero out the array of VMCB pointers so that pre_sev_run() won't see
garbage when querying the array to detect when an SEV ASID is being
associated with a new VMCB. In practice, reading random values is all
but guaranteed to be benign as a false
Zero out the array of VMCB pointers so that pre_sev_run() won't see
garbage when querying the array to detect when an SEV ASID is being
associated with a new VMCB. In practice, reading random values is all
but guaranteed to be benign as a false negative (which is extremely
unlikely on its own)
4 matches
Mail list logo