Hi Arnd!
On 12/18/20 11:13 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I've attached a patch for a partial revert of my original change, this
>> should still work with the final cleanup on top, but restore the loop
>> plus the local_irq_enable()/local_irq_disable() that I dropped from
>> the original
Hi Arnd!
On 12/18/20 11:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Sorry for causing this bug, and thank you for bisecting it
> down to my patch.
>
> Do you see any other strange behavior with that patch, or is
> this the only symptom you are aware of?
This seems to be the only issue I'm seeing so far.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:29 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd!
>
> On 10/30/20 4:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ia64 is the only architecture that calls xtime_update() in a loop,
> > once for each jiffie that has passed since the last event.
> >
> > Before commit 3171a0305d62
Hi Arnd!
On 10/30/20 4:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ia64 is the only architecture that calls xtime_update() in a loop,
> once for each jiffie that has passed since the last event.
>
> Before commit 3171a0305d62 ("[PATCH] simplify update_times (avoid
> jiffies/jiffies_64 aliasing problem)") in
From: Arnd Bergmann
ia64 is the only architecture that calls xtime_update() in a loop,
once for each jiffie that has passed since the last event.
Before commit 3171a0305d62 ("[PATCH] simplify update_times (avoid
jiffies/jiffies_64 aliasing problem)") in 2006, it could not actually do
this any
5 matches
Mail list logo
