Hi Weilyi and Matthias,
On 29/10/20 15:51, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/2020 12:18, Weiyi Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 11:53 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/10/2020 18:55, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
From: Weiyi Lu
For some power domain, like conn
On 27/10/2020 12:18, Weiyi Lu wrote:
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 11:53 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 26/10/2020 18:55, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
From: Weiyi Lu
For some power domain, like conn on MT8192, it should be default OFF.
Because the power on/off control relies the function of
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 11:53 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2020 18:55, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > From: Weiyi Lu
> >
> > For some power domain, like conn on MT8192, it should be default OFF.
> > Because the power on/off control relies the function of connectivity chip
> >
On 26/10/2020 18:55, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
From: Weiyi Lu
For some power domain, like conn on MT8192, it should be default OFF.
Because the power on/off control relies the function of connectivity chip
and its firmware. And if project choose other chip vendor solution,
those
From: Weiyi Lu
For some power domain, like conn on MT8192, it should be default OFF.
Because the power on/off control relies the function of connectivity chip
and its firmware. And if project choose other chip vendor solution,
those necessary connectivity functions will not provided.
5 matches
Mail list logo
