On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:40:14PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:46:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > The change simplifies the error handling path, how? A line of two which
> > >
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:40:14PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:46:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
...
> > The change simplifies the error handling path, how? A line of two which
> > explains how it has been achieved might help should someone reads the
> >
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:46:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
> Hi Dejin,
>
> Thank you for all the changes, looks good!
>
> You could improve the subject line, as it is very vague - what is the
> new function name more correct? Was the other and/or the previous one
> not
Hi Dejin,
Thank you for all the changes, looks good!
You could improve the subject line, as it is very vague - what is the
new function name more correct? Was the other and/or the previous one
not correct? Seems like you are correcting a typo of sorts, rather than
introducing a new function in
Use the new function pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() to allocate IRQ vectors,
the pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() function, an explicit device-managed version
of pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). If pcim_enable_device() has been called
before, then pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is actually a device-managed
function. It is
5 matches
Mail list logo
