On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 23:22 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:13:41 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 10:03 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:07:42 -0500, Huang, Kai
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 01:45 -0500,
On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:13:41 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 10:03 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:07:42 -0500, Huang, Kai
wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 01:45 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > Btw, probably a dumb question:
> > >
> > > Theoretically
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 10:03 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:07:42 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 01:45 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Btw, probably a dumb question:
> > > >
> > > > Theoretically if you only need to find a victim enclave you
On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:07:42 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 01:45 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
>
> Btw, probably a dumb question:
>
> Theoretically if you only need to find a victim enclave you don't need
> to put VA
> pages to the unreclaimable list, because those VA pages
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 01:45 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> >
> > Btw, probably a dumb question:
> >
> > Theoretically if you only need to find a victim enclave you don't need
> > to put VA
> > pages to the unreclaimable list, because those VA pages will be freed
> > anyway
> > when enclave is
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:35:57 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson
In a later patch, when a cgroup has exceeded the max capacity for EPC
pages, it may need to identify and OOM kill a less active enclave to
make room for
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 10:06 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:21:19 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 10:35 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Possible owner types */
> > > > > + union {
> > > > > + struct sgx_encl_page
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:21:19 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 10:35 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > +
> > + /* Possible owner types */
> > + union {
> > + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page;
> > + struct sgx_encl *encl;
> > + };
>
> Sadly for
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 10:35 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > +
> > > + /* Possible owner types */
> > > + union {
> > > + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page;
> > > + struct sgx_encl *encl;
> > > + };
> >
> > Sadly for virtual EPC page the owner is set to the 'sgx_vepc' instance it
>
Hi Kai,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 06:14:20 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson
In a later patch, when a cgroup has exceeded the max capacity for EPC
pages, it may need to identify and OOM kill a less active enclave to
make
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> In a later patch, when a cgroup has exceeded the max capacity for EPC
> pages, it may need to identify and OOM kill a less active enclave to
> make room for other enclaves within the same group. Such a victim
On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 20:06 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> In a later patch, when a cgroup has exceeded the max capacity for EPC
> pages, it may need to identify and OOM kill a less active enclave to
> make room for other enclaves within the same group. Such a victim
From: Sean Christopherson
In a later patch, when a cgroup has exceeded the max capacity for EPC
pages, it may need to identify and OOM kill a less active enclave to
make room for other enclaves within the same group. Such a victim
enclave would have no active pages other than the unreclaimable
13 matches
Mail list logo
