> On Dec 6, 2020, at 4:58 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 04/12/20 18:23, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>> An immediate response, actually the SEV live migration patches are preferred
>>> over the Page encryption bitmap patches, in other words, if
On 04/12/20 18:23, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020, Ashish Kalra wrote:
An immediate response, actually the SEV live migration patches are preferred
over the Page encryption bitmap patches, in other words, if SEV live
migration patches are applied then we don't need the Page
Hello Paolo,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:20:46PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/05/20 23:19, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > From: Ashish Kalra
> >
> > Add new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature for guest to check
> > for host-side support for SEV live migration. Also add a new custom
> >
On 12/4/20 12:41 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:07 AM Ashish Kalra wrote:
Yes i will post a fresh version of the live migration patches.
Also, can you please check your email settings, we are only able to see your
response on the
mailing list but we are not getting
This time I received your email directly.
Thanks,
Ashish
> On Dec 4, 2020, at 12:41 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:07 AM Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>
>> Yes i will post a fresh version of the live migration patches.
>>
>> Also, can you please check your email
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:07 AM Ashish Kalra wrote:
>
> Yes i will post a fresh version of the live migration patches.
>
> Also, can you please check your email settings, we are only able to see your
> response on the
> mailing list but we are not getting your direct responses.
Hrm, as in you
Yes i will post a fresh version of the live migration patches.
Also, can you please check your email settings, we are only able to see your
response on the
mailing list but we are not getting your direct responses.
Thanks,
Ashish
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> An immediate response, actually the SEV live migration patches are preferred
> over the Page encryption bitmap patches, in other words, if SEV live
> migration patches are applied then we don't need the Page encryption bitmap
> patches and we prefer the
An immediate response, actually the SEV live migration patches are preferred
over the Page encryption bitmap
patches, in other words, if SEV live migration patches are applied then we
don't need the Page encryption bitmap
patches and we prefer the live migration series to be applied.
It is not
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I applied patches -13, this one a bit changed as follows.
Can we hold up on applying this series? Unless I'm misunderstanding things,
much of what you're applying is superseded by a much more recent series to add
only the page encryption bitmap[*]. I
On 05/05/20 23:19, Ashish Kalra wrote:
From: Ashish Kalra
Add new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature for guest to check
for host-side support for SEV live migration. Also add a new custom
MSR_KVM_SEV_LIVE_MIG_EN for guest to enable the SEV live migration
feature.
Signed-off-by: Ashish
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:19 PM Ashish Kalra wrote:
>
> From: Ashish Kalra
>
> Add new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature for guest to check
> for host-side support for SEV live migration. Also add a new custom
> MSR_KVM_SEV_LIVE_MIG_EN for guest to enable the SEV live migration
> feature.
>
From: Ashish Kalra
Add new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature for guest to check
for host-side support for SEV live migration. Also add a new custom
MSR_KVM_SEV_LIVE_MIG_EN for guest to enable the SEV live migration
feature.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst
13 matches
Mail list logo
