On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 6:06 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > > with a lot of merge
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 6:06 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > > with a lot of merge
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > with a lot of merge conflicts.
> >
> > Did you try on top of cfi-10 Git tag which is based
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> with a lot of merge conflicts.
>
> Did you try on top of cfi-10 Git tag which is based on Linux v5.10?
>
> Whatever you successfully did... Can you give me a
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:33 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > > > Did you push it (oh ah push it push it really really really good...)
> > > > to your remote Git please :-).
> > >
> > > I thought I already pushed it pretty good ;-) do you not see it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Did you push it (oh ah push it push it really really really good...)
> > > to your remote Git please :-).
> >
> > I thought I already pushed it pretty good ;-) do you not see it?
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jpoimboe/linux.git
> > objtool-vmlinux
> >
> >
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:07 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:46:21PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > > I am interested in having Clang LTO
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:46:21PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> > > help with testing.
> > >
> >
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> > help with testing.
> >
> > I tried the Git tree mentioned in [3]
> > (together with changes from ).
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> help with testing.
>
> I tried the Git tree mentioned in [3]
> (together with changes from ).
>
> I only see in my build-log...
>
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:46 PM 'Sami Tolvanen' via Clang Built Linux
wrote:
>
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:46:17 -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to be used in the kernel.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:46:17AM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to be used in the
This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
to be used in the kernel. Google has shipped millions of Pixel
devices running three major
14 matches
Mail list logo
