On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 7:06 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:29:40 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Masami Hiramatsu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:25:04 -0700
> > > Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 29,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:25:04 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:51 AM Masami Hiramatsu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrii,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
> > > Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > >
>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:25:04 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:51 AM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andrii,
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
> > Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Masami,
> > >
> > > I can't really review most of that code as I'm
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:25 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> I'm just coming back from Japan (work and then a vacation), and
> catching up on my email during the 6 hour layover in Detroit.
>
> > Hey Masami,
> >
> > I can't really
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:51 AM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> Hi Andrii,
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> > Hey Masami,
> >
> > I can't really review most of that code as I'm completely unfamiliar
> > with all those inner workings of fprobe/ftrace/function_graph.
Hi Andrii,
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Hey Masami,
>
> I can't really review most of that code as I'm completely unfamiliar
> with all those inner workings of fprobe/ftrace/function_graph. I left
> a few comments where there were somewhat more obvious
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:53 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
I'm just coming back from Japan (work and then a vacation), and
catching up on my email during the 6 hour layover in Detroit.
> Hey Masami,
>
> I can't really review most of that code as I'm completely unfamiliar
> with all those inner
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:49 AM Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 9th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
> function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/170887410337.564249.6360118840946697039.stgit@devnote2/
>
> This
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:35:15 +0200
Florent Revest wrote:
> Neat! :) I had a look at mostly the "high level" part (fprobe and
> arm64 specific bits) and this seems to be in a good state to me.
>
Thanks for the review this long series!
> Thanks for all that work, that is quite a refactoring :)
Neat! :) I had a look at mostly the "high level" part (fprobe and
arm64 specific bits) and this seems to be in a good state to me.
Thanks for all that work, that is quite a refactoring :)
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 2:49 PM Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 9th version of the
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:36:18 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Can you review this series? Especially, [07/36] and [12/36] has been changed
> a lot from your original patch.
I haven't forgotten (just been a bit hectic).
Worse comes to worse, I'll review it tomorrow.
--
Hi Steve,
Can you review this series? Especially, [07/36] and [12/36] has been changed
a lot from your original patch.
Thank you,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:48:59 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 9th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
>
Hi,
Here is the 9th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
https://lore.kernel.org/all/170887410337.564249.6360118840946697039.stgit@devnote2/
This version is ported on the latest kernel (v6.9-rc3 + probes/for-next)
and fixed some
13 matches
Mail list logo