Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2018-01-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 David Miller : > From: Andrew Lunn > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100 > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Marcin Wojtas >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >>>

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2018-01-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 David Miller : > From: Andrew Lunn > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100 > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Marcin Wojtas >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >>> >>> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

From: Andrew Lunn Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100 > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Marcin Wojtas >> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >> >> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

From: Andrew Lunn Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100 > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Marcin Wojtas >> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >> >> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under >> > initial version of the

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2018-01-22 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andrew Lunn : > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Marcin Wojtas >> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >> >> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under >> > initial

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

2018-01-22 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andrew Lunn : > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Marcin Wojtas >> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >> >> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under >> > initial version of the patchset, however the

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Marcin Wojtas > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 > > > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under > > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were > >

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Marcin Wojtas > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 > > > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under > > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were > > for now abandoned

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were > for now abandoned from further re-sends. But doesn't the results of that

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were > for now abandoned from further re-sends. But doesn't the results of that discussion

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi David, There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were for now abandoned from further re-sends. As the v4 has had no objections until now and: - patches 1-2 were Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi David, There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were for now abandoned from further re-sends. As the v4 has had no objections until now and: - patches 1-2 were Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki - mvpp2

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi Marcin, I tested the series on a MacchiatoBin to ensure the mvpp2 DT support was still working. I was able to use all supported ports as before, and saw no issue. For all mvpp2 patches, you can add: Tested-by: Antoine Tenart Thanks! Antoine On Thu, Jan

Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi Marcin, I tested the series on a MacchiatoBin to ensure the mvpp2 DT support was still working. I was able to use all supported ports as before, and saw no issue. For all mvpp2 patches, you can add: Tested-by: Antoine Tenart Thanks! Antoine On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:31:37PM +0100, Marcin

[net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi, I quickly resend the series, thanks to Antoine Tenart's remark, who spotted !CONFIG_ACPI compilation issue after introducing the new fwnode_irq_get() routine. Please see the details in the changelog below and the 3/7 commit log. mvpp2 driver can work with the ACPI representation, as exposed

[net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

Hi, I quickly resend the series, thanks to Antoine Tenart's remark, who spotted !CONFIG_ACPI compilation issue after introducing the new fwnode_irq_get() routine. Please see the details in the changelog below and the 3/7 commit log. mvpp2 driver can work with the ACPI representation, as exposed