On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 05:45:16PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Ilkka Prusi
> > Note that /sbin is now just a symlink to /usr/sbin on Debian since 10
> > (Buster) as per FHS[1][2].
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/fhs
> > [2]
> >
From: Ilkka Prusi
> Sent: 02 January 2021 23:27
>
> > PATH for the root on Debian is
> > /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
> >
>
> Note that /sbin is now just a symlink to /usr/sbin on Debian since 10
> (Buster) as per FHS[1][2].
>
> [1]
From: Bernd Petrovitsch
> Sent: 02 January 2021 11:05
>
> On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 10:13 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [...]
> > To be honest I wondered why there were no more reports on this.
>
> Perhaps I'm not the only one who has /sbin and /usr/sbin in the
> $PATH of normal accounts too (and idk
PATH for the root on Debian is
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
Note that /sbin is now just a symlink to /usr/sbin on Debian since 10 (Buster)
as per FHS[1][2].
[1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/fhs
[2]
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 4:51 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 3:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:14 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > > > > /sbin/depmod
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $
> > IMHO users should not need to fix their environment.
> > ( The discussion is a bit obsolete as we now have a fix. )
>
> FWIW, I have no (and don't see any) problems simply appending
> /sbin:/usr/sbin to the $PATH in/for the kernel's scripts.
>
Another workaround is to pass
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 12:26 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 12:05 PM Bernd Petrovitsch
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 10:13 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > To be honest I wondered why there were no more reports on this.
> >
> > Perhaps I'm not the only one who
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 12:05 PM Bernd Petrovitsch
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 10:13 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [...]
> > To be honest I wondered why there were no more reports on this.
>
> Perhaps I'm not the only one who has /sbin and /usr/sbin in the
> $PATH of normal accounts too (and
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 10:13 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[...]
> To be honest I wondered why there were no more reports on this.
Perhaps I'm not the only one who has /sbin and /usr/sbin in the
$PATH of normal accounts too (and idk what's the default
behaviour of distributions is - my .bashrc "fixes"
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:52 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 3:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:14 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > > > > /sbin/depmod
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 3:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:14 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > > > /sbin/depmod
> > > > >
> > > > > $ which depmod
> > > > > [ empty ]
> > > > >
> > > > > $ echo $PATH
> > > > >
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 7:55 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:14 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > > > /sbin/depmod
> > > > >
> > > > > $ which depmod
> > > > > [ empty ]
> > > > >
> > > > > $ echo $PATH
> > > > >
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 5:14 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
> > >
> > > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > > /sbin/depmod
> > > >
> > > > $ which depmod
> > > > [ empty ]
> > > >
> > > > $ echo $PATH
> > > >
Hi!
> >
> > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > /sbin/depmod
> > >
> > > $ which depmod
> > > [ empty ]
> > >
> > > $ echo $PATH
> > > /opt/proxychains-ng/bin:/home/dileks/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
>
> Ok, I think this is a broken setup that has a
Hi all,
As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
(No merge commits counted, next-20201214 was the first linux-next after
the merge window opened.)
Commits in v5.11-rc1 (relative to v5.10): 12498
Commits in next-20201214:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:59 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:51 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 153 pass: 151 fail: 2
>
> Thanks for doing these for the mainline rc's too. I've seen them for
> the stable kernels, but it's lovely to see it
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:04 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > /sbin/depmod
> >
> > $ which depmod
> > [ empty ]
> >
> > $ echo $PATH
> > /opt/proxychains-ng/bin:/home/dileks/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
Ok, I think this is a
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:40 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:04 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > > $ dpkg -L kmod | grep bin | grep depmod
> > > /sbin/depmod
> > >
> > > $ which depmod
> > > [ empty ]
> > >
> > > $ echo $PATH
> > >
On 12/28/20 11:37 AM, Kalesh Singh wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> parisc: Failed to execute /sbin/init (error -12)
>>>
>>> Caused by: c49dd3401802 ("mm: speedup mremap on 1GB or larger regions")
>>
>> Looks like Kalesh is looking at it.
>>
>> I don't think that was supposed to matter at all on parisc, but
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:26 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> I also tested with LLVM toolchain v11.0.1-rc2 together with passing
> LLVM=1 and LLVM_IAS=1 to my make line.
>
> I had one ERROR:
>
> error: too few operands for instruction in arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
Looks like Paolo already picked up the
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:45 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:26 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > I also tested with LLVM toolchain v11.0.1-rc2 together with passing
> > LLVM=1 and LLVM_IAS=1 to my make line.
> >
> > I had one ERROR:
> >
> > error: too few operands for
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:51 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Build results:
> total: 153 pass: 151 fail: 2
Thanks for doing these for the mainline rc's too. I've seen them for
the stable kernels, but it's lovely to see it for rc1.
> ERROR: modpost: "irq_check_status_bit"
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 04:04:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Two weeks have passed, Christmas is over, and so is the merge window.
>
> I want to thank all the maintainers who sent in their pull requests
> early: we all wanted to get things done before the holidays really
> hit, and mostly it
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to LKML and linux-kbuild ML ]
Hi Linus,
I also tested with LLVM toolchain v11.0.1-rc2 together with passing
LLVM=1 and LLVM_IAS=1 to my make line.
I had one ERROR:
error: too few operands for instruction in arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
The issue was reported in
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:04 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:30 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to LKML and linux-kbuild ML ]
> >
> > Hi Linus, Hi Mashiro,
> >
> > thanks for the Linux v5.11-rc1 release.
> >
> > With a new release I always do
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 8:30 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to LKML and linux-kbuild ML ]
>
> Hi Linus, Hi Mashiro,
>
> thanks for the Linux v5.11-rc1 release.
>
> With a new release I always do my first builds with my distro's
> default compiler and linker (GCC
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to LKML and linux-kbuild ML ]
Hi Linus, Hi Mashiro,
thanks for the Linux v5.11-rc1 release.
With a new release I always do my first builds with my distro's
default compiler and linker (GCC v10.2.1 and GNU/ld BFD v2.35.1).
( It's approx. 40% faster than LLVM
Two weeks have passed, Christmas is over, and so is the merge window.
I want to thank all the maintainers who sent in their pull requests
early: we all wanted to get things done before the holidays really
hit, and mostly it seemed to work quite well.
In fact, it was rather nice to handle the big
The pull request you sent on Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:52:11 -0700:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> tags/linux-kselftest-kunit-5.11-rc1
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/706451d47b3716c24e0553dfdefba11d202effc1
Thank
The pull request you sent on Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:35:31 -0700:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> tags/linux-kselftest-next-5.11-rc1
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/7194850efa47c8dac6e805087dd23c7b03af019d
Thank
The pull request you sent on Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:59:10 -0700:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> tags/linux-kselftest-fixes-5.11-rc1
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/b80affe33fdd56c8e9f1f0f33ad99f9016a59195
Thank
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following KUnit update for Linux 5.11-rc1.
This kunit update for Linux 5.11-rc1 consists of:
-- documentation update and fix to kunit_tool to parse diagnostic
messages correctly from David Gow
-- Support for Parameterized Testing and fs/ext4 test updates to use
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following Kselftest update for Linux 5.11-rc1.
This kselftest update for Linux 5.11-rc1 consists of:
- Much needed gpio test Makefile cleanup to various problems with
test dependencies and build errors from Michael Ellerman
- Enabling vDSO test on non x86 platforms
Hi Linus,
Please pull this Kselftest fixes update for Linux 5.11-rc1.
This Kselftest fixes update for Linux 5.11-rc1 consists of build error
fixes for clone3 and rseq tests.
diff is attached.
thanks,
-- Shuah
The following
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:47 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Please pull the following cpupower update for Linux 5.11-rc1.
>
> This cpupower update for Linux 5.11-rc1 consists of a change to provide
> online and offline CPU information. This change makes it e
Hi Rafael,
Please pull the following cpupower update for Linux 5.11-rc1.
This cpupower update for Linux 5.11-rc1 consists of a change to provide
online and offline CPU information. This change makes it easier to keep
track of offline cpus whose cpuidle or cpufreq property aren't changed
when
36 matches
Mail list logo
