On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:28 +0530, Aggrwal Poonam wrote:
> Hello All
>
> The TDM driver just now does not have a proper framework. Probably the
> interface cannot be generalised as such. Hence we could not decide
> whether it would be right to think of a TDM framework. Infact the
> interface
]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Barkowski Michael;
Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
> Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On T
]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Barkowski Michael;
Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:28 +0530, Aggrwal Poonam wrote:
Hello All
The TDM driver just now does not have a proper framework. Probably the
interface cannot be generalised as such. Hence we could not decide
whether it would be right to think of a TDM framework. Infact the
interface this TDM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
> Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
>> "Aggrwal Poonam" <[EM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
Aggrwal Poonam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I am waiting
; Aggrwal Poonam; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Barkowski Michael;
Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14
; Aggrwal Poonam; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Barkowski Michael;
Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
"Aggrwal Poonam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
> "Aggrwal Poonam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello All
> >
> > I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
> >
> > If there are no objections please consider them for
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
"Aggrwal Poonam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All
>
> I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
>
> If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
>
if this isn't going to go through Alessandro Rubini/misc drivers, can
it go through
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
Aggrwal Poonam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
if this isn't going to go through Alessandro Rubini/misc drivers, can
it go through the akpm/mm
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
Aggrwal Poonam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
if this
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
Aggrwal Poonam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Hello All
I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
With Regards
Poonam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aggrwal Poonam
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
18 matches
Mail list logo
