On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:59 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising
> > > my computing position and could work for
On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising
> > my computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code.
> > So I'll be releasing a new
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising my
> computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code. So I'll
> be releasing a new version shortly.
Can you please make an incremental diff as
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 10:08, Con Kolivas wrote:
> However, I must inform people that I have to arrest the RSDL development
> for at least this week. I have a new and fairly serious neck problem that
> is being exacerbated badly by sitting in front of the computer for any
> extended period.
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 10:08, Con Kolivas wrote:
However, I must inform people that I have to arrest the RSDL development
for at least this week. I have a new and fairly serious neck problem that
is being exacerbated badly by sitting in front of the computer for any
extended period.
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising my
computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code. So I'll
be releasing a new version shortly.
Can you please make an incremental diff as
On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising
my computing position and could work for short stints on the rsdl code.
So I'll be releasing a new version
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:59 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 00:42, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:25 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
The good news is that in order to stay sane I've found ways of optimising
my computing position and could work for short
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 07:58, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007 03:03, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 02:31, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > On Monday 12 March 2007 22:26, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > > I think, it should be possible to spread this max expiration latency
> >
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 07:58, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 03:03, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 02:31, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 22:26, Al Boldi wrote:
I think, it should be possible to spread this max expiration latency
across
10 matches
Mail list logo
