On 05/09/2017 10:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
The
On 05/09/2017 10:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
The
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Hi Arnd, long time no see,
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> So in addition to GCC 7.1 I'd like to have at least GCC 6.3 around,
>> >> which builds kernels without
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Hi Arnd, long time no see,
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >> So in addition to GCC 7.1 I'd like to have at least GCC 6.3 around,
>> >> which builds kernels without warnings today.
>> >
>> > If you
Hi Arnd, long time no see,
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> So in addition to GCC 7.1 I'd like to have at least GCC 6.3 around,
> >> which builds kernels without warnings today.
> >
> > If you don't want warnings, turn off the warnings or just don't look at
> >
Hi Arnd, long time no see,
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:58:13AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> So in addition to GCC 7.1 I'd like to have at least GCC 6.3 around,
> >> which builds kernels without warnings today.
> >
> > If you don't want warnings, turn off the warnings or just don't look at
> >
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> >> I was able to build (bare-metal) toolchains for
>> >> all architectures except arc, m68k, tilegx and tilepro.
>> >
>> > arc needs a more
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> >> I was able to build (bare-metal) toolchains for
>> >> all architectures except arc, m68k, tilegx and tilepro.
>> >
>> > arc needs a more recent GCC; the other
Hello again,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> and adding --disable-multilib (for building x86-64 on a x86-64
> >> box without 32-bit libs)
> >
> > Why is this needed? What error are you seeing.
>
> It was something along the lines of not finding 32-bit
Hello again,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> and adding --disable-multilib (for building x86-64 on a x86-64
> >> box without 32-bit libs)
> >
> > Why is this needed? What error are you seeing.
>
> It was something along the lines of not finding 32-bit
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
> >> the cross compilers
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
> >> the cross compilers
On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi,
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
>> the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
>> The latest compiler I find there is
On 30/04/17 06:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi,
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
>> the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
>> The latest compiler I find there is
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
> the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
> The latest compiler I find there is 4.9.0, which celebrated its third
> birthday at the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
> the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
> The latest compiler I find there is 4.9.0, which celebrated its third
> birthday at the
On 04/26/2017 07:14 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi!
(Tony: I've seen you redirecting to "Chris" in an older email, but the
web archive doesn't have his email address)
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at
On 04/26/2017 07:14 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi!
(Tony: I've seen you redirecting to "Chris" in an older email, but the
web archive doesn't have his email address)
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at
Hi!
(Tony: I've seen you redirecting to "Chris" in an older email, but the
web archive doesn't have his email address)
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
The latest compiler I find there is
Hi!
(Tony: I've seen you redirecting to "Chris" in an older email, but the
web archive doesn't have his email address)
It seems that many people (even outside the Linux kernel community) use
the cross compilers provided at kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool.
The latest compiler I find there is
20 matches
Mail list logo