Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

2019-08-21 Thread jane . chu
Hi, Bruce, Dan, This patch took care the panic issue. thanks, -jane On 8/21/19 7:12 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: Probably just needs the following. I've been slow to get some bugfixes upstream, sorry--I'll go send a pull request now --b. commit 78e70e780b28 Author: He Zhe Date: Tue

Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

2019-08-21 Thread jane . chu
Hi, Dan, On 8/20/19 8:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:39 PM wrote: Hi, Apology if there is a better channel reporting the issue, if so, please let me know. I just saw below regression in 5.3-rc5 kernel, but not in 5.2-rc7 or earlier kernels. Is the error stable

Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

2019-08-21 Thread J. Bruce Fields
Probably just needs the following. I've been slow to get some bugfixes upstream, sorry--I'll go send a pull request now --b. commit 78e70e780b28 Author: He Zhe Date: Tue Aug 6 17:41:04 2019 +0800 nfsd4: Fix kernel crash when reading proc file reply_cache_stats

Re: kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

2019-08-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:39 PM wrote: > > Hi, > > Apology if there is a better channel reporting the issue, if so, please > let me know. > > I just saw below regression in 5.3-rc5 kernel, but not in 5.2-rc7 or > earlier kernels. Is the error stable enough to bisect?

kernel panic in 5.3-rc5, nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show+0x11

2019-08-20 Thread jane . chu
Hi, Apology if there is a better channel reporting the issue, if so, please let me know. I just saw below regression in 5.3-rc5 kernel, but not in 5.2-rc7 or earlier kernels. [ 3533.659787] mce: Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at 383e202000 [ 3533.659903] Memory failure: