On Tue, 13 Apr 2021, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> I think I've found the reason. trim_snb_memory() reserved the entire first
> megabyte very early leaving no room for real mode trampoline allocation.
> Since this reservation is needed only to make sure integrated gfx does not
> access some memory, it
On 4/13/21 11:23 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:34:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/13/21 9:58 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>> That works.
>>
>> Please send the next test.
>
> I think I've found the reason. trim_snb_memory() reserved the entire first
>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:34:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/13/21 9:58 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:21:48PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 4/12/21 11:06 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >>> Hi Randy,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0700, Randy
On 4/13/21 9:58 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:21:48PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/12/21 11:06 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> Hi Randy,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 4/12/21 10:01 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Apr
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:21:48PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/12/21 11:06 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 4/12/21 10:01 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap
On 4/12/21 11:06 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/12/21 10:01 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought about adding some prints to see what's causing
Hi Randy,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/12/21 10:01 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > I thought about adding some prints to see what's causing the hang, the
> > reservations or their absence.
On 4/12/21 10:01 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/11/21 11:14 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> Hi Randy,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:41:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 4/9/21 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:49:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/11/21 11:14 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:41:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 4/9/21 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20210408:
> >>>
>
On 4/11/21 11:14 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:41:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 4/9/21 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20210408:
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I cannot boot linux-next 20210408 nor 20210409 on an antique
>>
Hi Randy,
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:41:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/9/21 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20210408:
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot boot linux-next 20210408 nor 20210409 on an antique
> x86_64 laptop (Toshiba Portege).
>
> After many
On 4/9/21 4:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210408:
>
Hi,
I cannot boot linux-next 20210408 nor 20210409 on an antique
x86_64 laptop (Toshiba Portege).
After many failed tests, I finally resorted to git bisect,
which led me to:
git bisect start
# good:
12 matches
Mail list logo