Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

2019-04-03 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 01 Apr 2019, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

2019-04-01 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the > > > sunxi tree). Apparently

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

2019-04-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Lee, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the > > sunxi tree). Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been > > applied yet. > > Where is the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

2019-04-01 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:32:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > > Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ARCH_SUNXI > > Selected by [y]: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

2019-03-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:32:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on i386 or x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ARCH_SUNXI > Selected by [y]: > - CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN8I [=y] && COMMON_CLK [=y] && CLK_SUNXI [=y]