Hi Jon,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
>
> I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
> close...:)
Yeah, amazing innit! ;-)
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)
I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps getting in the way. If
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)
I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps
Hi Jon,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)
Hi Konrad,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> > ibft1 year, 9 months ago
>
> Can go away.
>
> > swiotlb 11 months ago
>
> Need it. Don't remove it pls.
>
> > tmem11 months ago
>
> Can go away.
OK, 2 removed.
Hi Konrad,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
ibft1 year, 9 months ago
Can go away.
swiotlb 11 months ago
Need it. Don't remove it pls.
tmem11 months ago
Can go away.
OK, 2
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I have listed
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have listed all the
Hi Sekhar,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori wrote:
>
> You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
> now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
> you to remove it for so long.
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
>
> This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only
> been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
> and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> asm-generic 9 months ago
I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend
to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I have listed all the
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
asm-generic 9 months ago
I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend
to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only
been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
and I've ACKed them for Ben to
Hi Sekhar,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
you to remove it for so long.
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
20 matches
Mail list logo
