On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>>> addition of the range. So,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>>>
On 2018-01-18 08:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>> deferring indefinitely.
>>
>> Fixes:
On 2018-01-18 08:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>> deferring indefinitely.
>>
>> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
> deferring indefinitely.
>
> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
> deferring indefinitely.
>
> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond
>
On 2018-01-17 16:05, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:34 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>> deferring indefinitely.
>>
>> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio:
On 2018-01-17 16:05, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:34 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
>> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
>> deferring indefinitely.
>>
>> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio:
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:34 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
> deferring indefinitely.
>
> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond
>
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:34 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
> addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
> deferring indefinitely.
>
> Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond
>
Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
deferring indefinitely.
Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond sleep")
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij
Without such a range, gpiolib fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, pending the
addition of the range. So, without a range, gpiolib will keep
deferring indefinitely.
Fixes: e10f72bf4b3e ("gpio: gpiolib: Generalise state persistence beyond sleep")
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
12 matches
Mail list logo