On 2018-01-19 07:13, Keith Busch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep
On 2018-01-19 07:13, Keith Busch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> >>> > +static bool
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:35:59AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> >>> > +static bool
On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>>> > +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> > +{
>>>
>>> I think you can
On 1/18/2018 12:32 AM, p...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>>> > +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> > +{
>>>
>>> I think you can
On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making
another copy here.
Of
On 2018-01-18 08:26, Keith Busch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making
another copy here.
Of
On 2018-01-17 21:57, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
+static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making
another copy here.
Of course, this would be another patch.
ok I will make a separate
On 2018-01-17 21:57, Sinan Kaya wrote:
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
+static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making
another copy here.
Of course, this would be another patch.
ok I will make a separate
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> > +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
>
> I think you can also make this function common instead of making another copy
> here.
> Of course, this would be another
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> > +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
>
> I think you can also make this function common instead of making another copy
> here.
> Of course, this would be another
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making another copy
here.
Of course, this would be another patch.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an
On 1/17/2018 5:37 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> +static bool dpc_wait_link_active(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
I think you can also make this function common instead of making another copy
here.
Of course, this would be another patch.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an
Implement error_resume callback in DPC so, after DPC trigger event
enumerates the devices beneath.
Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
index ed916765..f99adcae 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
+++
Implement error_resume callback in DPC so, after DPC trigger event
enumerates the devices beneath.
Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
index ed916765..f99adcae 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
+++
16 matches
Mail list logo