Re: st driver doesn't seem to grok LTO partitioning (LTO-5 firmware upgrade)

2017-12-25 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi, This is just to state that I used the SAS LTO firmware upgrade method Douglas suggested (1 year ago) and it worked fine, upgrading an HPE LTO-5 Ultrium 3000 internal SAS tape drive from a .frm / .E file. Best regards, -- Jérôme PS: It took me a while to find a way to get the latest

Re: Seagate External SMR drive USB resets (XHCI transfer error, not timeout)

2017-11-17 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi, On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:42:51 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Jérôme Carretero wrote: > > > I performed an usbmon capture extract, centered around the event > > (there was a few hundred MBs written for this to happen)

Re: Seagate External SMR drive USB resets (XHCI transfer error, not timeout)

2017-11-15 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi, On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:17:08 -0500 Jérôme Carretero <cj...@zougloub.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:40:08 +0900 > James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:

Re: Seagate External SMR drive USB resets (was: Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device)

2017-11-15 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi, On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 07:40:08 +0900 James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Jérôme Carretero wrote: > > > >   Because with several of these drives / lots of

Re: Seagate External SMR drive USB resets (was: Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device)

2017-11-15 Thread Jérôme Carretero
(Adding Tejun Heo who was assigned on still-open bugzilla #93581 which is about SATA but seems terribly related.) On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:43:14 -0500 Jérôme Carretero <cj...@zougloub.eu> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > > Tests are currently undergoing with drives operating in plain

Seagate External SMR drive USB resets (was: Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device)

2017-11-15 Thread Jérôme Carretero
7 12:38:14 -0500 Jérôme Carretero <cj...@zougloub.eu> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:04:53 +0100 > Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On 13-11-17 07:14, Jérôme Carretero wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Nov

Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device

2017-11-13 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi Hans, On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:04:53 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13-11-17 07:14, Jérôme Carretero wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:01:30 +0300 > > Andrey Astafyev <1...@246060.ru> wrote: > > > >> 13.11.2017

Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device

2017-11-12 Thread Jérôme Carretero
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:16:39 +0300 Andrey Astafyev <1...@246060.ru> wrote: > 13.11.2017 09:14, Jérôme Carretero пишет: > > For my devices, adding US_FL_NO_ATA_1X to unusual_uas.h didn't > > change anything, and while adding US_FL_IGNORE_UAS (using > > qui

Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device

2017-11-12 Thread Jérôme Carretero
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:01:30 +0300 Andrey Astafyev <1...@246060.ru> wrote: > 13.11.2017 00:42, Jérôme Carretero пишет: > > Nov 12 16:20:59 Bidule kernel: sd 22:0:0:0: [sdaa] tag#2 > > uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 3 inflight: CMD OUT > > [...] > > Do you see s

Re: [PATCH] uas: Add US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk for one more Seagate device

2017-11-12 Thread Jérôme Carretero
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:13:44 +0100 Hans de Goede wrote: > Just like all previous UAS capable Seagate disk enclosures, this > one needs a US_FL_NO_ATA_1X quirk. > [...] > +/* Reported-by: Andrey Astafyev */ Hi Andrey, I notice that you have an external

arcmsr: abort device command message weirdness (LUN mismatch)

2017-06-11 Thread Jérôme Carretero
Hi Ching, Context: when a drive finally failed in my JBOD array, I discovered that the whole ARC1880X controller would timeout, disabling access to any drive, which is kind of sad. I've performed a firmware upgrade and added back the failing drive to see what happens with a newer device firmware