Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] compiler: inline does not imply notrace

2023-05-25 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 25 May 2023 22:17:33 -0700 Nadav Amit wrote: > Ugh. If you cc’d me, I wouldn’t bother you during your vacation. :) Oh, and if you are interested in tracing patches, just subscribe to linux-trace-ker...@vger.kernel.org. -- Steve ___ linux-um

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] compiler: inline does not imply notrace

2023-05-25 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 25 May 2023 22:17:33 -0700 Nadav Amit wrote: > > FYI, I have a patch queued (still needs to go through testing) that > > already does this ;-) > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230502164102.1a51c...@gandalf.local.home/ > > Ugh. If you cc’d me, I wouldn’t bother you during your

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] compiler: inline does not imply notrace

2023-05-25 Thread Nadav Amit
> On May 25, 2023, at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:00:39 -0700 > Nadav Amit wrote: > >> From: Nadav Amit >> >> Functions that are marked as "inline" are currently also not tracable. >> This limits tracing functionality for many functions for no reason. >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] compiler: inline does not imply notrace

2023-05-25 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 25 May 2023 14:00:39 -0700 Nadav Amit wrote: > From: Nadav Amit > > Functions that are marked as "inline" are currently also not tracable. > This limits tracing functionality for many functions for no reason. > Apparently, this has been done for two reasons. > > First, as described in