On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:48:02PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
[snip]
if original driver is GPL, how about sending it for inclusion in
mainline ? If anybody wants to sponsor one USB3380 for my testing, I'd
be very thankful too as that'll help me make sure things get tested
before going
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
Hello
I have seen on the list that there was a previous interest on giving
support for this chipset. Is anyone currently working on it?
Apparently the chip can be configured in legacy mode being register
compatible
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:55:13AM -0800, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:43:11PM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
I was looking at the changes for net2280.c and saw your name come up in
a few of the more
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:16:12PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
Looking at the output of usbmon, the kernel re-uses URB addresses. Is it
possible that the urb is freed while the instruction is in
*implement()*?
In fact, the usbhid driver does not
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:04:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the reply.
Some updates:
After running usbmon, I realized that the paging request address is the
address of the urb.
That doesn't make sense. implement() shouldn't know anything about the
address of
