On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
However is the MFD cell approach acceptable?
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
However is the MFD cell approach acceptable?
Yes it is.
Going back to this old conversation... Actually, I disagree. There is
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Linus Walleij
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
But I also want to bring the device model into question: normally
when a mother device spawns children across different subsystems
we model them
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
But I also want to bring the device model into question: normally
when a
Hi,
Would this patch interfere with adding support for using the CBUS pins
as GPIOs while operating in normal UART mode?
Most interesting question!
Care was taken to prevent using GPIOs if the serial device is in use
and vice versa.
What about CBUS GPIO support?
Ok, so we're not
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Sascha Silbe x-li...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
The chips can operate either in regular or in bitbang mode. Care was
taken to prevent using GPIOs if the serial device is in use and vice
versa.
Very interesting patch! I've seen USB-based GPIO things before
but never
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Sascha Silbe x-li...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
The chips can operate either in regular or in bitbang mode. Care was
taken to prevent using GPIOs if the serial device is in use and vice
versa.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:21:55PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Most FTDI USB serial / parallel adapter chips support an asynchronous
bitbang mode. Make this functionality available as a GPIO controller
so they can be used with the Linux GPIO API instead of requiring
special user space software
#include linux/kernel.h
#include linux/errno.h
+#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
+#include linux/gpio.h
+#endif
Please create a new struct, a new file and put all the GPIO stuff in
there rather than #if bombing the driver.
You can then declare blank methods for the gpio stuff if GPIO is not
Hello.
On 06/09/2014 06:23 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
#include linux/kernel.h
#include linux/errno.h
+#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
+#include linux/gpio.h
+#endif
Please create a new struct, a new file and put all the GPIO stuff in
there rather than #if bombing the driver.
You can then
12 matches
Mail list logo
