Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Change ohci-hcd autosuspend mechanism

2006-09-27 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even if no one else does).

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Change ohci-hcd autosuspend mechanism

2006-09-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:58 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patch 3 is much more experimental than the first two, and probably also more controversial (I expect David will have a lot to say about it, even if no one else does). In fact, I won't even CC: Andrew on this one;

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Change ohci-hcd autosuspend mechanism

2006-09-25 Thread Alan Stern
Greg and Andrew: This series of patches completely reworks the way ohci-hcd carries out root-hub autosuspends. The existing code is not compatible with the new core USB autosuspend mechanism. Patch 1 is a simple one-line change to usbcore with no harmful effects. It can go directly into

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Change ohci-hcd autosuspend mechanism

2006-09-25 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Monday, 25 September 2006 21:40, Alan Stern wrote: Greg and Andrew: This series of patches completely reworks the way ohci-hcd carries out root-hub autosuspends. The existing code is not compatible with the new core USB autosuspend mechanism. Patch 1 is a simple one-line change