Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:21 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:57 +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
This patch cleans up xmon to keep consistency.
In xmon, we should use console I/O functions that are named the
same
as
On Jul 26, 2007, at 9:58 PM, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Hi all,
These patches based on Linus' tree, as of today.
I don't know mpc83xx ... are there any PPC folk who can see
any reason not to just merge these patches? They look OK
to me, but in
Hi,
I want to know how the kernel switch the task. Because my kernel
start very well, and it launch the init.d. With the log, i can see that
the kernel launch the getty task. But after, there is a decrementer
overflow interrupt ( vector at adress 900 ). Is it the task switch? Or
is
On Jul 27, 2007, at 1:36 AM, Nicolas Mederle wrote:
Hi,
I want to know how the kernel switch the task. Because my
kernel
start very well, and it launch the init.d. With the log, i can see
that
the kernel launch the getty task. But after, there is a decrementer
overflow
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Documentation clearly states, that mode should not be changed
till SPMODE_ENABLE bit set. I've seen hangs w/o this patch.
Out of interest what board/part do you see the hang on?
- k
___
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 01:46 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 1:36 AM, Nicolas Mederle wrote:
Hi,
I want to know how the kernel switch the task. Because my
kernel
start very well, and it launch the init.d. With the log, i can see
that
the kernel launch the
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 21:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Merged a fixed version:
f5d834fc34e61f1a40435981062000e5d2b2baa8
(In linus tree as of now)
I hope so. Alan's patch looks rather different from what you have
now:
fall back to of_find_node_by_name() if
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:42:50 +0800 Zhang Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#include asm/of_device.h
+#include asm/of_platform.h
These should now be linux/of_device.h and linux/of_platform.h
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:45:08 -0500
Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:56:55PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+void (*fsl_spi_activate_cs)(u8 cs, u8 polarity) = NULL;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsl_spi_activate_cs);
+void
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
These patches are the version 3 patches for RapidIO with dts update
and some minor fixups.
These patches are used for supporting RapidIO controllers of
Freescale. I ported them from ppc architecture to powerpc
architecture and added some
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
This patch adds the RapidIO support to the powerpc architecture.
Some files are moved from ppc. OF-tree and OF-device supports are
added.
New silicons such as MPC8548, MPC8641 with serial RapidIO
controller are
all supported.
Memory driver
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
mmc_spi already tested to work. When it will hit mainline
the only change that would be needed is replacing spidev
by mmc_spi, and adding trivial platform data to mmc_spi
driver.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
Add the explanation and a sample of RapidIO OF node to the document
of booting-without-of.txt file.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt | 37 +++
+++
1 files
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c | 76 ++
+++
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h |3 ++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
There
Hi Drew,
thanks a lot for your good feedback. See comments below.
I'll try to provide an updated version next week. It would
be nice if you could post a patch for your driver once
we have addressed the issues you mentioned. Then we would
have the eHEA driver for the SKB interface, and your driver
Just to chime in...
In general, I like where this LRO effort is going, and I really
appreciate you guys working on it.
Jeff
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:07:07PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Loopback mode is supported by various controllers, this mode
is useful for testing, especially in conjunction with spidev
driver.
ISTR that Stephen Street provided a loopback
This patch fixes arch/ppc kernels, at least for prep subarch, after
build-id addition. Without the patch, kernels were 3 times the size and
bootloader refused to load them. Now they are back to normal again.
I just built an ARCH=ppc kernel for the prep subarch and the vmlinux
size was
Hello Scott and all,
In your patch for the pq2fads support, the device tree seems to be missing
a memory node, for which dtc complains loudly. Is this board tested to
boot with these patches (because I'm now using this as a template for my
board - with your patchset applied to Paul's git)
Hello Roland!
This small patch set fixes some coding-style related issues for ehca:
[1/2] remove checkpatch.pl's warnings externs should be avoided in .c files
[2/2] correction include order according kernel coding style
Thanks
Nam
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:48:33AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:01:39PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
If CONFIG_PCI undefined, np will be used uninitialized, thereby
find_node_by_name(np, par_io) will fail.
This is the wrong fix -- you should be passing NULL to the
Hi, Kumar,
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
This patch adds the RapidIO support to the powerpc architecture.
Some files are moved from ppc. OF-tree and OF-device supports are
added.
New silicons
From b5d0336089b5ebe5b18acb94b2c94c2026cb95ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hoang-Nam Nguyen hnguyen at de.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:24:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] remove checkpatch.pl's warnings externs should be avoided in
.c files
Signed-off-by: Hoang-Nam Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
From a2794450cbee597cefd7b6e159257583c459d358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hoang-Nam Nguyen hnguyen at de.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:26:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] correction include order according kernel coding style
Signed-off-by: Hoang-Nam Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:54:50PM +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
From b5d0336089b5ebe5b18acb94b2c94c2026cb95ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hoang-Nam Nguyen hnguyen at de.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:24:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] remove checkpatch.pl's warnings externs should be avoided
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:14:06AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
@@ -207,20 +222,36 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
device_type = spi;
+device-id = 1;
Can we just use the reg value for
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:45:59PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Sure, technically nothing prevents this. But, QE specs names
SPIs by these ids. Plus, from the kernel side spi name will be
not pretty, it will be spi1216.1. Reg value making little sense
to the userspace (or kernel-side SPI
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:24:08PM +0300, Alexandros Kostopoulos wrote:
In your patch for the pq2fads support, the device tree seems to be missing
a memory node, for which dtc complains loudly. Is this board tested to
boot with these patches (because I'm now using this as a template for my
Thanks for your reply, Scott,
one question though: I am NOT using the bootwrapper, I'm instead feeding
dtb and uImage directly to u-boot. This probably means that I should fill
in lots of stuff manually into dts, right? But, (and please forgive my
ignorance) who does actually fill in stuff
Alexandros Kostopoulos wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Scott,
one question though: I am NOT using the bootwrapper, I'm instead
feeding dtb and uImage directly to u-boot. This probably means that
I should fill in lots of stuff manually into dts, right?
No, u-boot should fill in the same
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc86xads_setup.c | 14 --
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc885ads_setup.c | 14 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc86xads_setup.c
This patch series removes lingering jiffies initialization
code from several platforms. Note that the first patch in
this series for the 86xx has been rebased to current top of
Paul's repository and replaces an earlier version.
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200.c | 13
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Note -- This is a rebased version of an earlier patch
from July 17. That one can be dropped.
arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_hpcn.c | 14 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200.c | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/lite5200.c
index 5c46e89..84bd3da 100644
---
Grant Likely wrote:
Mild question; What the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are you doing trying to backport to
a
2 year old kernel?!? :-)
That's what happens in the embedded space. It's the current version
from our distro vendor. It's also the version that all our different
board suppliers could
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 19:17, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
3) Padded frames.
I may be missing something, but I don't see where you
either strip padding from frames or reject padded frames.
(see the pskb_trim_rcsum() in net/ipv4/ip_input.c:ip_rcv()
I think I
Kim
p.s. should the stable team be notified to fix 2.6.22 for
Lombard-nvram-style machines?
Logically, yes.
Practically it does not matter that much it seems. I've got the
feeling the Lombard-users-group-size is about one person which is
going to drop to zero if he doesn't get any further
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:25:09PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW for the prpmc2800 part...
Acked-by: Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 00:11 +0200, Rutger Nijlunsing wrote:
Kim
p.s. should the stable team be notified to fix 2.6.22 for
Lombard-nvram-style machines?
Logically, yes.
Practically it does not matter that much it seems. I've got the
feeling the Lombard-users-group-size is about one
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:26:47 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 00:11 +0200, Rutger Nijlunsing wrote:
Kim
p.s. should the stable team be notified to fix 2.6.22 for
Lombard-nvram-style machines?
Logically, yes.
Two ! Paulus has one
Yoann Padioleau writes:
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
As other people have said, if you're going to spend time on this,
testing (!buf) is more idiomatic in the kernel than (buf == NULL).
Paul.
___
42 matches
Mail list logo
