Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sean MacLennan
b614a697dc17dff82f140d72d21a095f810fa7fb is first bad commit commit b614a697dc17dff82f140d72d21a095f810fa7fb Author: Anders Kaseorg ande...@mit.edu Date: Thu Apr 23 16:49:33 2009 -0400 kbuild, modpost: Check the section flags, to catch missing ax/aw When you put .section .foo

help with MPC8272ADS board

2009-05-03 Thread Landau, Bracha
Hi, I'm trying to get the MPC8272ADS evaluation board up and running with the latest versions of u-boot and Denx linux (2.6.24). I use the device tree file (mpc8272ads.dts) provided. Based on another post, I updated the MPC8260ADS.h file, changing OF_CPU from c...@0mailto:c...@0 to

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sean, On Sat, 2 May 2009 22:41:26 -0400 Sean MacLennan smaclen...@pikatech.com wrote: Latest pull from Linus' git. Cheers, Sean WARNING: vmlinux.o (.text): unexpected non-allocatable section. Did you forget to use ax/aw in a .S file? Note that for example linux/init.h contains

[PATCH] powerpc: convert mace to netdev_ops

2009-05-03 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Dave. On Apr 27 2009, David Miller wrote: You can fix the mace_set_timeout() function arguments by having a helper function that simply wraps around it and provides the second expection of argument types. I hope that this version is a slightly better fix to convert mace to netdev_ops.

Re: Next April 28: boot failure on PowerPC with SLQB

2009-05-03 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 16:10 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 12:00:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Nick, On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:05:42 +0200 Nick Piggin npig...@suse.de wrote: Hmm, this might do it. The following code now passes some stress testing in a

Re: Next April 28: boot failure on PowerPC with SLQB

2009-05-03 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 18:10 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: @@ -2194,16 +2197,16 @@ static void *kmem_cache_dyn_array_alloc( * never get freed by definition so we can do it rather * simply. */ - if (!nextmem) { - nextmem

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sean MacLennan
On Sun, 3 May 2009 20:45:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: What gcc, binutils versions and config are you using? gcc version 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1 4.0.0) GNU assembler version 2.16.1 (powerpc-linux) using BFD version 2.16.1 And this is all running on the Warp with a 440EP.

Re: help with MPC8272ADS board

2009-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Bracha, In message 065a7d06f7d4e546a18e80e08d066e1811892dd...@ilma1.il.nds.com you wrote: I'm trying to get the MPC8272ADS evaluation board up and running with the latest versions of u-boot and Denx linux (2.6.24). 2.6.24 is actually very old and not even close to latest. Latest is (as

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sean MacLennan, In message 20090503123959.0cc5c...@lappy.seanm.ca you wrote: What gcc, binutils versions and config are you using? gcc version 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1 4.0.0) GNU assembler version 2.16.1 (powerpc-linux) using BFD version 2.16.1 And this is all running on the Warp with

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:33:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Sean MacLennan, In message 20090503123959.0cc5c...@lappy.seanm.ca you wrote: What gcc, binutils versions and config are you using? gcc version 4.0.0 (DENX ELDK 4.1 4.0.0) GNU assembler version 2.16.1

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sam, in message 20090503200701.ga32...@uranus.ravnborg.org you wrote: The thing is, that I cannot reproduce this - I tested it with v2.6.30-rc4, both with ELDK 4.1 (as you) and ELDK 4.2. Both build the kernel image without any such warnings. Anders already found the cause of

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sean MacLennan
On Sun, 3 May 2009 22:07:01 +0200 Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote: On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:33:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Which exact commands did you use to build the kenrel, and how did you set (and export?) the CROSS_COMPILE environment variable? export

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sam Ravnborg
I ran the tests on a LE machine: Linux gemini.denx.de 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Wed Feb 11 23:58:12 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I will push the patch in a few minutes. For reference it is below: Sam From: Anders Kaseorg ande...@mit.edu Subject:

Re: unexpected non-allocatable section

2009-05-03 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 04:32:41PM -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote: On Sun, 3 May 2009 22:07:01 +0200 Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote: On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:33:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Which exact commands did you use to build the kenrel, and how did you set (and

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: convert mace to netdev_ops

2009-05-03 Thread David Miller
From: Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:48:20 -0300 I hope that this version is a slightly better fix to convert mace to netdev_ops. This is against this morning's net-2.6 tree. Signed-off-by: Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br I'll apply this, thanks! I made one

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: convert mace to netdev_ops

2009-05-03 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 14:15:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:48:20 -0300 I hope that this version is a slightly better fix to convert mace to netdev_ops. This is against this morning's net-2.6 tree.

Re: Porting the ibm_newemac driver to use phylib (and other PHY/MAC questions)

2009-05-03 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 00:26 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote: Ok, I've dug through the docs on the 460EPx (the CPU I'm using), and I'd like some confirmation of the following: * The EMAC hardware itself internally has its own dedicated MDIO/MDClk lines, driven by the STACR register. Yes, though

Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Pass dev ptr to dma_*_coherent rather than NULL

2009-05-03 Thread Ben Dooks
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:43:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Mark Ware wrote: Recent DMA changes result in a BUG() when NULL is passed to

Re: [PATCH] i2c-cpm: Pass dev ptr to dma_*_coherent rather than NULL

2009-05-03 Thread Mark Ware
Ben Dooks wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:43:14AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:11:51AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Mark Ware wrote: Recent DMA changes result in a BUG() when NULL is passed to