On 2/17/2012 6:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:42:31PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
[...]
@@ -1237,8 +1238,10 @@ twl_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct
i2c_device_id *id)
pdata-irq_base = status;
pdata-irq_end = pdata-irq_base +
Hi Grant,
On 2/16/2012 11:52 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:09:01 -0700
Grant Likelygrant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
This series generalizes the irq_host infrastructure from powerpc
so that it can be used by all architectures and renames it to irq_domain.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:42:31PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 2/16/2012 11:52 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:09:01 -0700
Grant Likelygrant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
This series generalizes the irq_host infrastructure from powerpc
so that it can
/*
* Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
* no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
* within this file.
*
* Thanks. --rmk
*/
A quick grep indicates that we've lost this battle ;) Is the comments
still true?
This series generalizes the irq_host infrastructure from powerpc
so that it can be used by all architectures and renames it to irq_domain.
Very little has changed between v4 and this version. A number of bug
fixes have been applied and a few refinements. Biggest change is a
rewrite of the
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:09:01 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
This series generalizes the irq_host infrastructure from powerpc
so that it can be used by all architectures and renames it to irq_domain.
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c is fairly horked on i386 allmodconfig:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:52:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:09:01 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
This series generalizes the irq_host infrastructure from powerpc
so that it can be used by all architectures and renames it to irq_domain.
