On 29/09/2021 17:44, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 29/9/21 11:43 pm, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:> I'm not a huge fan either,
I used it to keep the control flow as is and
without introducing several calls to to_pci_driver.
The whole code looks as follows:
list_for_each_entry(afu_dev,
On 29/9/21 11:43 pm, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:> I'm not a huge fan either,
I used it to keep the control flow as is and
without introducing several calls to to_pci_driver.
The whole code looks as follows:
list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, >phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
struct
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:15:37PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 29/9/21 6:53 pm, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:>
> list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, >phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > - if (afu_dev->driver && afu_dev->driver->err_handler &&
> > -
On 29/9/21 6:53 pm, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:>
list_for_each_entry(afu_dev, >phb->bus->devices, bus_list) {
- if (afu_dev->driver && afu_dev->driver->err_handler &&
- afu_dev->driver->err_handler->resume)
-
struct pci_dev::driver contains (apart from a constant offset) the same
data as struct pci_dev::dev->driver. Replace all remaining users of the
former pointer by the latter to allow removing the former.
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
