On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:44:21PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
>
> (something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise)
>
> Hi,
>
> Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we
> discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
(something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise)
Hi,
Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we
discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than
having a struct describing architecture
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
Hi,
Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we
discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than
having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying
the consumer of execmem.
And I do think
