[Logcheck-devel] Bug#542663: logcheck: /etc/cron.d/logcheck runs too often (now every 2 hours)

2009-08-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net [2009.08.21.0214 +0200]: A more appropriate default would be every 24h (once a day). I can't speak for other people, but when I was sysadmin, I wanted to be informed of any problems *now*, not the day after. On all of my machines, puppet

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 532719 is wishlist

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 532719 wishlist Bug #532719 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: filter pam_env complaining about missing /etc/default/locale Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#355574: Acknowledgement (logcheck-database: Logcheck password expiration)

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:20:37AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: I would agree, though, that if Bastille already reports this information in some way (say, via email), then it's redundant to report it again. I'm sorry, you don't understand Bastille's task. Bastille does not

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 355574 is wishlist, tagging 355574 ...

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 355574 wishlist Bug #355574 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: Logcheck password expiration Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' tags 355574 = wontfix Bug #355574 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: Logcheck password

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#448788: marked as done (postfix/postgrey: Sender address rejected: are not filtered out)

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:57:29 -0400 with message-id 20090821145729.ga27...@toroia.fbriere.dyndns.org and subject line Re: Bug#448788: postfix/postgrey: Sender address rejected: are not filtered out has caused the Debian Bug report #448788, regarding postfix/postgrey: Sender

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 448788

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 448788 - moreinfo Bug #448788 {Done: Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net} [logcheck-database] postfix/postgrey: Sender address rejected: are not filtered out Removed tag(s) moreinfo. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 410453 is wishlist, retitle 410453 to logcheck-database: ignore iptables -j LOG messages

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 410453 wishlist Bug #410453 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: filter kernel messages for UDP as well as TCP/IP traffic Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' retitle 410453 logcheck-database: ignore iptables -j LOG messages Bug

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 375428 is wishlist

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 375428 wishlist Bug #375428 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: postfix's syslog_name is configurable Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 430365 is wishlist

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 430365 wishlist Bug #430365 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: gconf Finnish message rules Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:13:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Conffiles are not automatically deleted on upgrade. You have to remove It would appear that logcheck has shed many files over the years: $ git log --summary master origin/1.2 -- rulefiles/linux/ | \ grep 'delete mode'

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 453519 is normal, tagging 453519 ...

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 453519 normal Bug #453519 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new Severity set to 'normal' from 'minor' tags 453519 - moreinfo Bug #453519 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database:

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 538696

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # fixed by 8a8cf8c tags 538696 pending Bug #538696 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: dovecot logout filter Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 510889

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # fixed by fca042e, 2dd2246 and 0ce52d7 tags 510889 pending Bug #510889 [logcheck-database] enhanced rule(s) for deliver (dovecot) Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#532484: please incorporate qmail filters

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:36:25AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: The reason for this email to send you a copy of a file that I am using on my FreeBSD system in ignore.d.paranoid to limit the messages that are pulled out as I am now using logcheck to also check my maillog file qmail is actually

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: reassign 532484 to qmail-src

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 532484 qmail-src Bug #532484 [logcheck-database] please incorporate qmail filters Bug reassigned from package 'logcheck-database' to 'qmail-src'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 511483

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 511483 wontfix Bug #511483 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: please add rules for rkhunter Added tag(s) wontfix. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 526116

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # fixed by 4b58627 tags 526116 pending Bug #526116 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: Please filter out more dhcp3-server messages Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Logcheck-devel] Reassigning 532484

2009-08-21 Thread Jon Marler
reassign 532484 qmail stop # qmail-src generates no logs ___ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#453519: Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new

2009-08-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net writes: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:13:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Conffiles are not automatically deleted on upgrade. You have to remove It would appear that logcheck has shed many files over the years: $ git log --summary master origin/1.2 --

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: severity of 442244 is wishlist

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 442244 wishlist Bug #442244 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: should include the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

[Logcheck-devel] wiki.logcheck.org

2009-08-21 Thread Eric Evans
The logcheck wiki (http://wiki.logcheck.org) has been moved to a new host, and upgraded to a newer version of moinmoin (to 1.7.1 from 1.5.3). Please let me know if you spot anything out of place. Thanks, -- Eric Evans eev...@sym-link.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:03:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Do we have the md5 checksums of the last version that we shipped with the package anywhere? Yes, that can be easily extracted. I see two issues with this: First, there's no guarantee that the file will be the last version shipped.

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#453519: Bug#453519: logcheck-database: amavisd-new file looks like the one shipped by amavisd-new

2009-08-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Frédéric Brière fbri...@fbriere.net writes: Yes, that can be easily extracted. I see two issues with this: First, there's no guarantee that the file will be the last version shipped. If a file was included in version X, modified in X+1, and removed in X+2, it's possible that the user

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#534724: Enhanced kernel rules

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:23:13PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Attached please find a patch to extend kernel logcheck rules. You might want do check the changes line by line as some of them could still be specific for my systems. Thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, I don't

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 534724

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 534724 wontfix Bug #534724 [logcheck-database] Enhanced kernel rules Added tag(s) wontfix. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#497325: logcheck-database: please ignore NetworkManager Supplicant state changed

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
A quick note to whoever who would take on this task: the network-manager log messages have completely changed between 0.6 (lenny) and 0.7 (squeeze). Enjoy! -- We come to bury DOS, not to praise it. -- Paul Vojta, vo...@math.berkeley.edu

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#502965: please consider these rules for openntpd

2009-08-21 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: Could you please consider the following rules to mitigate the very, very, very, very annoying messages coming from openntpd on certain servers? ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ ntpd\[[0-9]+\]: reply from [0-9.]+: negative

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 502965

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 502965 patch moreinfo Bug #502965 [logcheck-database] please consider these rules for openntpd Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

[Logcheck-devel] Processed: tagging 504100

2009-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 504100 unreproducible Bug #504100 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: Minor change to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-ssh fixes whitespace related problem. Added tag(s) unreproducible. End of message, stopping processing here.