Dima Kogan <li...@dima.secretsauce.net> writes: > Do you think this is better? I can go either way.
Well, this only adds the "exited" messages, and I find it better that you don't hide anything from the user. The added "exited" is no distraction at all, I think. >> I would also put the whole example in a section of its own, presumably >> named "EXAMPLE", or maybe "SYMBOL FILTERING EXAMPLE". That should only >> come after the "FILTERING EXPRESSIONS", as conceptually it builds on >> what's written there. It would however be good to refer to this new >> section from -e, -x and -l. > > Sure? I think the way it is now is better. Both putting the examples > first (all perl docs do that, and they tend to be very good) and putting > them into the same section (but different subsections). If you don't > have strong feelings here, I'd rather leave it. In my opinion, explanations of differences between -x, -e and -l don't belong in a section that describes filtering expressions, which is a logically lower-level topic. I don't have particularly strong feelings about ordering though, so if you think it's better to put examples first, then so be it. Thanks, PM _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list Ltrace-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel