On 05/06/13 01:01, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com
mailto:yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 04/06/13 21:35, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
hardware that is too old to install Lubuntu from a current LiveCD or
On 06/04/2013 04:44 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
Hi everybody,
mörgæs has described old hardware, where Lubuntu is a good choice: which
CPUs, how much memory, which applications etc. See the opening post in
the following thread at the Ubuntu Forums: Old hardware
Hello Lubuntu devs and everyone,
I'm so sorry if I'm bringing an old topic to the discussion table but as
Lubuntu Member and user, I'm asking for a professional explanation from a
developer of Lubuntu because I'm seriously LOST. So, please don't hate me.
I really need your help by explaining to
Hi Phill,
Thank you for your reply but I appreciate if the devs could answer my Qs
because what you have said I'm aware of and this is what we tell our new
users. I am asking for more information :)
@Our Devs:
Another Q:
What makes LXLE, which is based on Lubuntu 12.04 an LTS release? while
On 05/06/13 12:50, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
Hi Phill,
Thank you for your reply but I appreciate if the devs could answer my Qs
because what you have said I'm aware of and this is what we tell our new
users. I am asking for more information :)
An excellent explanation here:
On 05/06/13 13:27, Erick Brunzell wrote:
On 06/04/2013 01:59 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
2013/6/3 Jonathan Marsdenjmars...@fastmail.fm:
But, back to the 'lubuntu-core' vs 'lubuntu-desktop' issue, I'd
prefer that we take an approach similar to that of Edubuntu where
they offer additional
Ali,
please understand the difference. anything that starts 'lx' and pcmanfm
will not receive updates in lubuntu 12.04 once it goes 'EOL' to Lubuntu.
Updates provided by 'core' systems (e.g. kernel, chomium etc.) will
continue to be available.
Regards,
Phill.
On 5 June 2013 13:30, Yorvyk
2013/6/5 Erick Brunzell lbsol...@yahoo.com:
I'm a bit concerned after reading this:
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/05/possible-changes-in-ubunu-1310-saucy.html
Hummm, you should only trust what is said on this mailing list. Don't
trust outside sources if there is no quotes or source in this
2013/6/5 Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com:
An excellent explanation here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
Especially this part :
The LTS designation applies only to specific subsets of the Ubuntu
archive. The LTS may not apply to all flavors and remixes of Ubuntu.
For example, for 8.04 LTS,
On 05/06/13 20:07, Julien Lavergne wrote:
2013/6/5 Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com:
An excellent explanation here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
Especially this part : The LTS designation applies only to specific
subsets of the Ubuntu archive. The LTS may not apply to all flavors
and remixes
Hi Jonathan,
Maybe raise a bug that says you have zero supported packages instead of
just dying?
Regards,
Phill.
On 6 June 2013 03:27, Jonathan Marsden jmars...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 06/05/2013 01:32 PM, Yorvyk wrote:
Just heard this on UUPC and thought it relevant, in a terminal type:
On 06/05/2013 08:08 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Maybe raise a bug that says you have zero supported packages instead
of just dying?
But they won't backport the fix to Lucid :)
Actually this app is more than a little scary in its tight
Canonical-oriented definition of supported. If you do
Thank you for sharing knowledge about
ubuntu-support-status
and giving us a chance to run
ubuntu-support-status --show-unsupported
and decide how to continue (business as usual, remove some unsupported
packages, or upgrade to a newer version).
The output of this command (with and without
Hi testers,
There has been several discussions which I have not sent each day to this
list about testing 13.10. But, it is now time to ask your thoughts
We found that cadence testing last cycle did not really help lubuntu, as
such I've asked for us to go back to alpha testing. One of the
Hi everybody,
I found some recent comments about the bug 1165200. I will try if it
would help to add a python and a gudev library (it does for some people,
but not all according to the comments). If it is a general solution, I
suggest it should be fixed in the lubuntu code and trickle down to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
