so this basically means that lxde will soon be QT based DE correct?
This is the answer i was looking for. If that is going to happen, fine, no
problem. lxde will be qt based and our efforts will focus on Qt. otherwise,
as said, we should focus on improving what we have instead of
experimenting..
i don't want to sound annoying, but don't you think you are wasting time
and focus?
GTK2+ , GTK3, Qt.. a lot of games but little innovation or real
development ..
i have some questions..
where is the project going?
what are the developers goals?
what framework are you choosing to allow people
On 4 July 2013 10:47, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
Will razor-qt source tree be separated into different modules in the
future?
I agree that's needed. I can't say whether it will actually be done, as I
don't commit a lot myself, but for the sake of cooperation I do believe we
should make
Attention, i'm not arguing on what is the best framework for you to use.
I'm just arguing on the fact that right now we have a static stable gtk
environment. from this perspective, the Qt development is a simple
experiment that is taking away valuable time that could be use to improve
the gtk
Doesn't sound like it could be used. The idea would be to have actual
app-managed widgets with an interface to the file manager for integration
(grid style etc).
J. Leclanche
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jerome Leclanche
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
Really awesome.
And holy hell, the screenshot looks like it could have been Razor-qt.
I'm really glad we have an actively developped file manager and image viewer
in Qt as those were two apps that were seriously
2013/7/4 Andrea Florio and...@opensuse.org:
Attention, i'm not arguing on what is the best framework for you to use. I'm
just arguing on the fact that right now we have a static stable gtk
environment. from this perspective, the Qt development is a simple
experiment that is taking away
