Re: [NEW] www/unit

2021-10-05 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Hey Ryan, On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:42:21PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 29, 2021, at 04:50, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > 2. added php module, commented out at the moment, PHP embed SAPI is > > required to build Unit's PHP module, here's the > > I wasn't aware of the existence of the

Re: get a compiler version?

2021-10-05 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Thanks for the reply, Ryan! On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 05:55:19PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Oct 3, 2021, at 16:02, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:27:19AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2021-10-4 03:20 , Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > >>> I've found that www/unit

Re: [NEW] www/unit

2021-10-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 29, 2021, at 04:50, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > 2. added php module, commented out at the moment, PHP embed SAPI is > required to build Unit's PHP module, here's the I wasn't aware of the existence of the PHP embed SAPI, but now that I am, I should be able to add this to the php

Re: get a compiler version?

2021-10-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 3, 2021, at 16:02, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:27:19AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2021-10-4 03:20 , Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >>> I've found that www/unit builds, primarily unit-perl* and unit-ruby >>> modules, fail when it runs with clang13. And that's because

Re: Portfile dependencies relying on specific variant

2021-10-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 5, 2021, at 05:36, Frank Dean wrote: > > I've submitted a pull request [1] for a new Portfile, `mod_tile`, but the > checks are failing because this port requires the `mapnik` port to be > installed with a non-default variant, `+postgis`. Similarly, it requires the > `osm2pgsql` port to

Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-05 Thread Fred Wright
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, Christopher Jones wrote: On 4 Oct 2021, at 5:54 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote: I was hoping to move this along for the overwhelming benefit of the license, but TBH the push-back so far is 99.99% negative about moving to openssl 3.0.0 this year, so too controversial for me to

Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-05 Thread Vincent Habchi
> On 5 Oct 2021, at 20:10, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > I suspect if we wait, we'll just end up doing this same thing later - so > might as well get it over with now. The sooner we get to a state where > (mostly) things all work with the latest openssl, the better. Just my tuppence: While I

Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-05 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:54 PM, Ken Cunningham wrote: > I was hoping to move this along for the overwhelming benefit of the license, > but TBH the push-back so far is 99.99% negative about moving to openssl 3.0.0 > this year, so too controversial for me to get involved with. I'll sit back > for

Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-05 Thread Renee Otten
I guess it would be helpful if the maintainers of openssl would chime in and let us know what they plan to do regarding the update. It’s unfortunate that Ken his attempts to get this moving are being shut down so quickly and he doesn’t feel motivated anymore to work on this… The main goal

Portfile dependencies relying on specific variant

2021-10-05 Thread Frank Dean
Apologies, resending to dev list as incorrectly sent to user's list. I've submitted a pull request [1] for a new Portfile, `mod_tile`, but the checks are failing because this port requires the `mapnik` port to be installed with a non-default variant, `+postgis`. Similarly, it requires the