Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives

2007-07-24 Thread John A. Martin
st == Stephen J Turnbull Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:56:35 +0900 st Jeff Breidenbach writes: Notice that of 325146 total messages, 624 of them had no message-id header. Even if you aggregate dup+col, you're still looking at a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives

2007-07-04 Thread John A. Martin
st == Stephen J Turnbull Re: [Mailman-Developers] Improving the archives Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:49:58 +0900 st The main drawback to using Message IDs that I can see is that st broken MUAs may supply no Message-ID, or the same one st repeatedly. In the former case, as a last resort

Re: [Mailman-Developers] LTMP for incoming mail

2006-09-28 Thread John A. Martin
Brad == Brad Knowles Re: [Mailman-Developers] LTMP for incoming mail Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:06:29 -0500 Brad Maildir was not designed as an efficient queue-on-disk Brad strategy. Is in not possible to do Postfix virtual mailbox domains _without_ maildir style delivery? (Considering

[Mailman-Developers] Re: (Fwd) Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: How to rem

2004-04-05 Thread John A. Martin
Brad == Brad Knowles Re: (Fwd) Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: How to rem Mon, 5 Apr 2004 00:08:34 +0200 Brad Okay, so a Keep-These-Headers option being restricted Brad to just the following: Brad From: Brad Subject: Brad To:

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver

2003-10-30 Thread John A. Martin
claw == J C Lawrence Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:22:32 -0500 claw I may be unusual in this regard, but I generally consider claw list archives as one-way systems: messages go in and never claw come out. Out of idle curiosity, why

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver

2003-10-29 Thread John A. Martin
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 3:06 PM -0500 2003/10/27, Kevin McCann wrote: I was thinking about using MHonarc to enhance the archive experience but it doesn't work with MySQL directly so Mail::Box just might be what the doctor ordered. No database handles BLOB (Binary

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver

2003-10-28 Thread John A. Martin
claw == J C Lawrence Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:30:23 -0500 claw 1) We guarantee uniqueness of all Message IDs. The only way claw to do this is to rewrite all IDs. This will piss off some claw people. Less perhaps if you

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver

2003-10-28 Thread John A. Martin
Iain == Iain Bapty [Mailman-Developers] Requirements for a new archiver Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:00:57 + Iain Functional Requirements The archive component should Iain 1. store email discussions. Iain 2. integrate with Mailman. Iain 3. provide a web-based interface to those

Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives

2003-09-29 Thread John A. Martin
Harald == Harald Meland Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:09:09 +0200 baw == Barry Warsaw Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0400 baw we could rewrite all

Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives

2003-09-28 Thread John A. Martin
baw == Barry Warsaw Re: [Mailman-Developers] @ in mail **text** gets replaced inarchives Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0400 baw On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 05:13, Harald Meland wrote: [Barry Warsaw] I really really want to use something like message-ids to generate message

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Bounce removal parameters default values

2003-09-26 Thread John A. Martin
Greg == Greg Stark Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Bounce removal parameters default values 26 Sep 2003 12:45:46 -0400 Greg Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greg Causing valid bounces to be sent to the envelope sender Is required by the standards. Greg Instead the list

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.2 doesn't work with postfix-style virtual domains + patch

2003-09-13 Thread John A. Martin
baw == Barry Warsaw Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman 2.1.2 doesn't work with postfix-style virtual domains + patch 13 Sep 2003 18:43:42 -0400 baw On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 05:46, Steve Alexander wrote: Mailman 2.1.2 writes out a sendmail-style virtual-mailman file rather than a

Re: [Mailman-Developers] script

2003-09-05 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 baw == Barry Warsaw Re: [Mailman-Developers] script 05 Sep 2003 08:08:41 -0400 baw Take a look in cvs. There's a script called bin/discard baw which takes a list of file names and does proper discards on baw all those files. I'll be

[Mailman-Developers] Absentee list owners become suicidemail-bombers

2003-08-18 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What defenses does Mailman have against suicide mail-bomber attacks? The suicide mail-bomber has a number of list-owner addresses for which the receiving MTAs take delivery and subsequently send a Mail Delivery Warning mail message back to the list

[Mailman-Developers] Attempt to invoke directly as script

2003-08-02 Thread John A. Martin
Log entries like the following appear with some regularity. ,[ Excerpt from /var/log/apache-ssl ] [Fri Aug 1 15:54:12 2003] [error] [client 128.242.232.130] attempt to invoke directory as script: /usr/lib/cgi-bin/mailman ` I've poked around a bit but haven't seen how to tickle the

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Cutting Received: headers

2003-06-11 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roman == Roman Sinelnikov [Mailman-Developers] Cutting Received: headers Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:50:22 +0400 Roman Dear colleagues, one more idea, it would be very convenient Roman to have an optional cutting of Received: headers in any

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: Cutting Received: headers (John A.Martin)

2003-06-11 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom == Tom Neff [Mailman-Developers] Re: Cutting Received: headers (John A. Martin) Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:57:09 -0400 Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John A. Martin) wrote: [Roman Sinelnikov wrote:] Dear colleagues, one more idea, it would

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications consideredharmful

2003-01-16 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 BAW == Barry A Warsaw Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:12:07 -0500 BAW So vote by the -1/0/+1 rules against these options: BAW 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is