[Gluster-Maintainers] Jenkins build is back to normal : regression-test-burn-in #1159

2016-06-15 Thread jenkins
See ___ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

2016-06-15 Thread Richard Fontana
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:02:12PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > But we don't need to guess, we can just ask our resident legal > counsel, who wi ll tell us if there are any implications to calling > our planned long life cycle release of Community GlusterFS an "LTS > release." > > Off hand I

[Gluster-Maintainers] Build failed in Jenkins: regression-test-burn-in #1158

2016-06-15 Thread jenkins
-ne 0 ']' + filename=logs/glusterfs-logs-20160615:03:49:19.tgz + tar -czf /archives/logs/glusterfs-logs-20160615:03:49:19.tgz /var/log/glusterfs /var/log/messages /var/log/messages-20160522 /var/log/messages-20160529 /var/log/messages-20160605 /var/log/messages-20160612 tar: Removing leading `/

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

2016-06-15 Thread Niels de Vos
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:58:24PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > hi, > > Some of our managers were cautioning us to use the term LTS with > > care as it means something else in ubuntu world

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport acceptance criteria

2016-06-15 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi, > > with the close to getting released 3.8, I would like to make sure that > we do not start to backport features and make invasive changes. This > should ensure us that most developers work on the next version with a >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport acceptance criteria

2016-06-15 Thread Kaushal M
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:12:12PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > with the close to getting released 3.8, I would like to make sure that

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

2016-06-15 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:55:09AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 06/14/2016 10:59 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:02:12PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > But we don't need to guess, we can just ask our resident legal > > > counsel, who wi ll tell us if there are

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12

2016-06-15 Thread Kaushal M
Hi all, If anyone doesn't know about it yet, the release process for a release has changed. Refer to the mail thread [1] for more information. tl;dr, component maintainers need to now provide an acknowledgement that their component is ready to the release manager, for the manager to make the

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release scheduling and lifecycle of versions

2016-06-15 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 06/14/2016 10:59 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:02:12PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: But we don't need to guess, we can just ask our resident legal counsel, who wi ll tell us if there are any implications to calling our planned long life cycle release of Community

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport acceptance criteria

2016-06-15 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:20:46PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > with the close to getting released 3.8, I would like to make sure that > > we do not start to backport features and make invasive

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.8.0 released

2016-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Gluster Build System wrote: > SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.8.0.tar.gz NetBSD's pkgsrc has been updated for glusterfs 3.8.0 See it soon at http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/filesystems/glusterfs/README.html --