[Marketing] Gimp article for review

2016-03-29 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
Hi everyone! I had a format issue. For the rest, I completed this article without problems. Sorry I couldn't do it before. Can anyone take a look? https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=11874_id=11874 Cheers, Thanks Sylvia -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org List info or to

Re: [Marketing] Review Requested: Updated Python Brochure

2016-03-29 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hi, On 03/28/2016 02:47 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote: Thanks all for the text updates! I just sent the SVG files to Máirín, and I can update the text after the design changes. Sound cool? I made a design team ticket for it and came up with an initial design for it to match the python shirt:

[Marketing] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Marketing IRC Meeting

2016-03-29 Thread jflory7
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Marketing IRC Meeting on 2016-03-30 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This meeting is for team members of the Fedora Marketing team. More information can be found on the

Re: [Marketing] Review Requested: Updated Python Brochure

2016-03-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 03/29/2016 09:48 AM, Brian Proffitt wrote: > Except there is a file size limit on the Trac system (mentioned in the > first message on this thread). Each file alone is too big. > I've bumped up the file size limit. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com |

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Jon Stanley
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > "We're now on track to release on June 7th"? Problem here is what if we slip again? Now we have external parties holding us to a specific date. $0.02 -Jon -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Marketing] Review Requested: Updated Python Brochure

2016-03-29 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hey, On 03/29/2016 09:48 AM, Brian Proffitt wrote: Except there is a file size limit on the Trac system (mentioned in the first message on this thread). Each file alone is too big. Whoever has admin on the trac instance can up that value. (We had to do this on the design-team trac.) The

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 03/29/2016 09:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Fair. How about "on track for our planned June release", or something? "We're now on track to release on June 7th"? -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb |

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 09:06:31AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > I'm expecting all of our release announcements to be read by folks who > view them through a less nuanced lens than somebody hip-deep in the > process. A good rule of thumb for this kind of thing - if you have to > justify or

Re: [Marketing] Rebase-helper article

2016-03-29 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi Ryan, I read updated article and seems to be fine. I have realized, you removed a part about API. Is there any reason for it? Though, thanks for the review. It is better then my. Greetings Petr On 03/28/2016 09:37 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:27:02AM -0300, Sylvia

Re: [Marketing] Rebase-helper article

2016-03-29 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi Ryan, I don't have a permissions. Greetings Petr On 03/27/2016 01:36 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: Hi all, I have just completed my edit of the rebase-helper article! I did a little pruning to try to make it more suitable for the magazine audience, but i think it is pretty much ready to go in my

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:47:53AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Erm. We've slipped by four weeks, right? :-) Maybe we want to change > this. Sorry to point this out at the last minute. It kind of depends on how you're counting. If we're going from the ideal target, it's, like, 5 weeks. If we go

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 03/29/2016 08:20 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Only the Alpha has slipped by four weeks. The last one week slip of > the Alpha has not influenced the GA for the F24 Final, which is now > 2016-Jun-07. OK, I stand... sit, corrected. Still, "right on schedule" is probably not quite correct. Best, jzb

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Jan Kurik
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 03/28/2016 10:51 PM, Remy DeCausemaker wrote: >> mktg et al, >> >> Below (and attached) is the final draft of the F24 Alpha Release >> Announcement for your review. If you have any edits before we push at >> 10am, I will

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 03/28/2016 10:51 PM, Remy DeCausemaker wrote: > mktg et al, > > Below (and attached) is the final draft of the F24 Alpha Release > Announcement for your review. If you have any edits before we push at > 10am, I will be checking my inbox and the pagure repo one last time > around 9am, which can

Re: [Marketing] F24 Release Announcement -- Now on Pagure

2016-03-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:51:23PM -0400, Remy DeCausemaker wrote: > Below (and attached) is the final draft of the F24 Alpha Release > Announcement for your review. If you have any edits before we push at Looks great! I added a paragraph about gcc 6, because it seems like if we're mentioning the