[MLL]Crush the revisionist positions of "El Diario Internacional"!

[Maoist Documentation Project]

We are reposting this message from the Peru People's Movement for those
who are interested in what is happening with the People's War in Peru.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear comrades and friends:

We send you an important article from the upcoming issue of Red Sun.
Given the importance of the question concerned we have considered it 
appropriate to publish it ahead of the publication of issue nr. 20 of Red
Sun magazine, which we will publish soon.

The editors of Red Sun.

Note: See the formated article on the web page of Red Sun.

http://www.redsun.org/mpp_doc/mrs_feb2001.htm

----------------------------------------------------


(Extract of the Red Sun Magazine nr 20)



Crush the convergences with the revisionist and capitulationist Right
Opportunist Line abroad; unmask and crush the revisionist positions of "El
Diario Internacional"!


The revisionist and capitulationist Right Oppportunist Line (lod) has been
crushed, through people's war, by the Communist Party of Peru, that
applies in a masterful way marxism-leninism-maoism, gonzalo thought,
principally gonzalo thought, because it is the creative application of the
universal truth to our concrete reality and our guarantee of triumph until
Communism; the lod has never been structured inside the Party, but outside
it in the prisons, nursed and fathered by the reactionary armed forces and
its fascist regime, all this under the command of yankee-imperialism and
within its "20-year plan". Within the Party convergences with the lod were
expressed in the sphere of ideas, criteria, positions and attitudes, but
the present lod never structured within the Party; and they were swept
away in two-line struggle, and so was the case in all the field of the
people. Now the lod is crushed, the rats have stampeding disbanded and the
shows they recently have tried to carry out are nothing else than an
attempt to save themselves from the revolutionary justice that sooner or
later inevitably will arrive and before it they will more than pay for
their black treason against Chairman Gonzalo,the Party and Revolution; it
will be like this no matter what it happens. Now what corresponds to do is
to sweep away finally and fully what is left of the lod abroad, and see
there the necessity of finishing with the convergences left in the field
of the people.

Thus it is necessary to unmask and crush the revisionist positions that
have been expressed for a long time on the pages of "El Diario
Internacional" (EDI); the authors of this magazine, for many years, have
been turning away from the line of the Party and they are basically
negating all the Party documents since the capture of Chairman Gonzalo,
negating in this way the leadership of the Party they have attacked
rottenly and systematically the Party work abroad. We have insisted on
trying to solve this situation in all possible ways, but because of their
stubbornness and insistence on the worst type of rotten bourgeois
individualism they have insisted on their filth and they have reached the
point of converging so systematically with the lod that, in the present
situation, they clearly tend to put there feet in the swamp of
revisionism, and have the nerve to go to the miserable lines of the damned
lod, hence the necessity of crushing and unmasking the revisionist
positions of EDI publicly. That is why we have issued the following text
in which we briefly point out some of the most vitals points in which the
editors of EDI launch attacks against the line of the Party, against the
almighty gonzalo thought.


Critics to the document entitled "POLITICAL DECLARATION" of the
"First International analyses Seminary about the people's war in
Peru", distributed by "El Diario Internacional".


1. Starting with the name of the seminar: Since when has a seminar been
held abroad to "analyze" the people's war in Peru? What do the organizers
of this event imagine, that from abroad they should "analyze" the
situation in Peru, the people's war? And to cap it all, without
representation of the Party! The concrete is, that they are negating the
leading role of the Party; they think they are illuminated, that they know
more than the Party about the Peruvian revolution; if yesterday it was
about the international situation, now they pretend to know more than the
Central Committee about the people's war itself. This "inflated" guy of
EDI has gotten totally lost in his fantasy world, he is so ridiculous that
we are quite amazed that some people still can take what he says
seriously. They express revisionist criteria of negating the leading role
of the Party and they think that he can "taste the flavor of the apple
without eating it" which it is pure idealism. At bottom, it is a
revisionist position.

2. The document starts: "The present difficulties that the Communist Party
of Peru (PCP), go through and the regression of the people's war doesn't
take away the merits of the valiant Peruvian communists, the same that
since 1980 have make heroic efforts to develop the armed struggle, to
liquidate the system of oppression and to conquest the Power to the
oppressed." This is his starting point.

This is a complete negation of what it has been established by the Party,
which is the only thing that corresponds to reality: The people's war is
coming out of the bend in the road which was the significance of Chairman
Gonzalo's capture. The quoted extract express a revisionist position
because like all the revisionists they only see the black of their own
grave; they sow pessimism acting like an echo of the hoax of
"pacification", serving the plans of yankee imperialism and converging
totally with the rats of the lod, putting forward "the regression of the
people's war"; what has happened was a temporary inflexion in the three
instruments of the revolution, and this has not been the first in the
people's war, but this one, like the previous ones, are being overcome by
the Party applying gonzalo thought to solve all the new problems that have
arisen in the process of the people's war, within the Strategic
Equilibrium, building the Conquest of the Power in the whole Country.
Those who are speaking of "regression" (Note that this word is repeated in
the text and is the fundamental argument in the whole discourse) are the
miserable rats of the lod and their reactionary and imperialist master;
then if you claim to support the people's war why do you act like the
resonance box of what the enemy says? At bottom, it is a revisionist
position.

3. The document continues: "In 20 years of people's war, the Peruvian
Maoists led by the PCP and Chairman Gonzalo have given admirable lessons
that remain solidity deep rooted among the masses and the proletariat of
Peru."

That they "have given admirable lessons"!? And what happened to gonzalo
thought? The editors talk only about "admirable lessons", but not about
our guarantee of triumph until communism, and Chairman Gonzalo is not - to
them- the center of party unity; in this way they launch attacks against
the base of party unity, against Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, gonzalo thought,
against the program and the general political line. For them the people's
war is something from the past, always speaking in past tense, soon the
same as the lod, they will start to speak of "the fourth stage of Peruvian
society", that is where one arrives when one doesn't know how to settle in
the line of the Party, in the red line of Chairman Gonzalo, the same as
the lod; they preach capitulation and they only keep in their minds the
people's war like memories, like a story to tell their grandchildren. They
look for amnesty; try to reduce gonzalo thought to something from the
past. At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

4. The document continues: "The PCP, during two decades of titanic
struggle against a gigantic repressive force of more than 650 thousand
military, police and paramilitary forces; witch are supported by United
States and other imperialist powers, have proven that it's an authentic
Party of the proletariat, capable of confronting and resisting it's
enemies on an adverse field full of obstacles." 

And what about conquering the Power? For them the Party is only able to
resist; they don't say that the party is defeating each one of the
"encirclement and annihilation campaigns" of the enemy, that the long term
plan of Yankee imperialism is being crushed, that the people's war comes
out more tempered and the conquest of Power in the whole country it is
being built. It is the same that the reaction says: "The shining path is
not able to win, they are strategically defeated"; or the lod state: "the
people's war have been defeated". Those are the black dreams of
imperialism, reaction and revisionism. At bottom, it is a revisionist
position.

5. Further on they say: "The PCP, in these 20 years of intense armed
struggle, could put into practice the fundamental thesis of the scientific
theory of the proletariat (marxism-leninism-maoism), and starting from the
own Peruvian experience developed important thesis for the struggle of the
communists... Another thesis is the one that expresses that all
revolutionary processes led by the proletariat have the necessity to
generate en guiding thought of the revolution."

Merely a lot of "thesis", but these are to him no longer universal truths
of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, principally Maoism, and even more, of gonzalo
thought; they reduce gonzalo thought, they don't point out that it gives
contributions to the development of marxism. So then, neither is it a
coincident that they forget the Great Leadership (Jefatura); because on
the base of the Guiding thought, every revolution must generate a Great
Leadership (Jefatura), like the Party line establish. We can see that
since the beginning they are negating the Party, gonzalo thought, and our
Great Leadership (Jefatura) Chairman Gonzalo; they think of themselves as
great Marxists, but they are full of revisionism, they say that they
struggle against revisionism in the bosom of the international communist
movement, but concretely they express the same revisionist positions as
the other individuals that try to trade on the struggles of the
international proletariat and the peoples of the world. Assuming a
revisionist position that doesn't even keep up appearances, talking about
"thesis", they don't put forward that gonzalo thought is the application
of the universal truth of maoism to our concrete reality made by our Great
Leadership (Jefatura) and that contributes to the development of marxism,
minimizing in deeds the action and thought of Chairman Gonzalo and in that
way they negate our base of party unity and the light that guides our
people's war, the almighty gonzalo thought until Communism! that was given
to us by the Congress and the revisionists always try to negate gonzalo
thought. So, what does EDI say? At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

6. Further on, it continues: "The fujimorist regime..." What? Are we
reading "La Repblica"?

These stupidities about "fujimorism" are something that is used by
reaction (the so called "opposition") to negate that it has been a
fascist, genocidal and country-selling regime, that has failed in it's
task of defeating the people's war; this is the main reason that the
yankees now are setting another puppet as president of the old State, and
the motive is not the corruption and the drug trafficking. The authors of
this text have never agreed with the typification of the regime as fascism
(no say fascism curtly, but a fascism to adapted to combating the people's
war) made by the Party, but have agreed completely with
the lod in putting forward that this was not the case. These characters
are repeating what the reaction says and negating what the Party has put
forward? Is it not, by any chance, obvious to everybody in the world that
this is a characteristic of every revisionist? At bottom, it is a
revisionist position.

7. The text say: "For these reasons, Peru's present crisis is a deep
crisis that shows the moral and political misery of all those who
coexisted with the administrator of the narco-government of Peru. This
crisis is not only a problem of fujimorism; at bottom it's a total crisis
of the bourgeois landowner political system of Peru submitted to the
imperialism."

The essence of the problem was never a problem of moral, the problem is
that it was a fascist, genocidal and country-selling regime of the old
bureaucratic-landowner state, that it was not able to defeat the people's
war, and that because of this it could not fulfill what yankee-imperialism
demanded for the accomplishment of its "20-year plan". About the "crisis",
they negate the situation of the bureaucratic capitalism, that it is in
its last and final crisis, being destroyed by the Party through the
people's war; they talk of a "political system", but don't talk about its
economic base nor say that the old Peruvian state, as any state, is a
class dictatorship; if today you negate that there is
landowner-bureaucratic dictatorship, tomorrow will you not perhaps negate
the necessity of the dictatorship of the proletariat? At bottom, it is a
revisionist position.

8. Let's see their conclusion on the national situation: "What should be
done about this problem? The exploited of Peru must combat equally against
the remainders of fujimorism and all those in the nauseating parliament,
the political parties, the NGO's, the church and the universities who
contributed and maintained the ill-fated regime of Fujimori and
Montesinos. The peruvian people must take lesson from the passed, and we
must keep in mind that today they present themselves as moralizers and
unbridled anti-fujimorists when they were the first to support the
narco-fujimorism, since it was installed 1990. The
oppressed, if they really want to get rid off the deceit, the manipulation
and the swindle must act with their own movement of struggle, independent
from the bourgeoisie classes and parties that since decades have move
within the fraud and demagogy. Without a frontal struggle witch have the
strategic objective of conquest of Power and the defeat of the oppressors
and their political representatives, the oppressed will be deceited and
used time and again to balance the internal brawls of these."

Very well! It wasn't a rabbit who came out of the hat, it was rather a
rat! They have already forgotten about the classes; they talk about "the
exploited" and "the oppressed" but nothing concerning the proletariat, the
peasantry, the petty
bourgeoisie, the national bourgeoisie. Not a word on the indispensable
leadership of the proletariat through its general staff, the Communist
Party of Peru. Not a word about the only road of the people, the
democratic road, being the People's war. They talk about the "conquest of
Power" but don't put forward how to do it, except for "frontal struggle";
they fear the revolutionary violence, they negate the great principle that
"Power grows out of the barrel of a gun". Are they perhaps not converging
with the lod, that put forward "the war without arms"? It is pure
capitulation. At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

9. Further on, we see how they trade on the defense of the life of
Chairman Gonzalo for the sake of personal interest, it says:"We propose
that Luis Arce, director of 'El Diario Internacional' should be a part of
this Commission, who must have the guarantee of the present government to
allow him to enter Peru and carry out his profession freely."

This caps it all! Shamelessly he asks for amnesty, and not only that, but
also enrollment; this gentleman not only wants the reaction to "forgive
him" for the small things that he claims to have done, but also wants to
be allowed to work within the old order. The same as his old pals of the
lod! He has stripped and revealed himself as a miserable traitor; what
next? Is he going to make an international campaign to raise funds for his
trip? He is following the course of all the capitulators; it can never be
allowed that an individual trades with the defense of Chairman Gonzalos
life. It is a sinister attitude. At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

10. Further on, we read: "The annulations of the sentences and legal
proceedings against the citizens accused of terrorism and treason is a
step backwards and must serve as a juridical frame to LIBERATE THE
POLITICAL PRISONERS AND PRISONERS OF WAR, including those that are under
arrest since the first years of the 1980's."

He likes so much the new puppets of yankee-imperialism that he believes
that the political prisoners and the prisoners of war of the Party are
going to be liberated by a reactionary regime! They negate that the only
way to liberate the militants, combatants and masses that now are in the
shining trenches of combat, is through the people's war. They negate that
the principal way to defend their lives is with people's war; they are
saying the same as the lod. It's obvious that they no longer have any
confidence in the Party and the masses, the only thing that they see is
their pessimism, their capitulationism and their revisionism. For them the
people's war is no longer necessary to liberate the political prisoners
and the prisoners of war. At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

11. Further on he is bolting concerning "the current crisis of leadership
of the ICM...", but he hasn't understood anything, and everything he is
putting forward clashes with the line of the Party; he doesn't adhere to
anything in the international line of the Party, what the Party has
reaffirmed applying masterfully marxism-leninism-maoism, gonzalo thought,
in several documents and directives, and he doesn't see how the Party is
assuming its role as red faction within the international communist
movement.

He doesn't understand a bit of the current situation in the international
communist movement and within the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement,
and he is converging with what he claims so much to combat. He is
politically blind and isrepeating things that not even he himself can
handle, it is vulgar. Neither does he understand the strategic offensive
of the world revolution, nor that the revolution has become the principal
historical and political tendency, nor that the new great wave of the
world proletarian revolution has started to develop, nor does he
understand how the struggle against the revisionist positions witch is
expressed by some in the RIM, is being carried out in the current
situation, nor does he understand the general counterrevolutionary
offensive led by yankee-imperialism at a world level. They understands
nothing, they can't handle anything; but believes they know everything.
And he paints himself as an "anti-revisionist"! The reason he doesn't
understand anything, is that he has another position at bottom: like the
lod, he wants to sustain the idea of the "RIM, communist parties only by
name", and like the lod, he dreams of "the retreat of the world
revolution". He spreads pessimism and doesn't see the current process of
the world proletarian revolution: that maoism is being incarnated in the
peoples of the world, generating militarized marxist-leninist-maoist
Communist Parties, marching unstoppably to command and lead this new great
wave of world proletarian revolution that has started to develop! The only
thing that the authors of this document see is their own rotten pessimism.
At bottom, it is a revisionist position.

12. In the last part of the text, it says: "The fundamental political task
to give an impulse to the international communist movement is to work for
the construction, reconstruction and strengthening of true communist
parties."

How do they define "true communist parties"? They don't. Their only
criteria to be in agreement with a party or an organization is if it
spreads the EDI or invites the editor of this magazine to, at different
events, trade on the name of the Party and the people's war. That is why
he lends himself to collaborate with all kinds of revisionists and
opportunists at an international level. He doesn't assume the position of
the Party, that is that we need militarized, marxist-leninist-maoist
Communist Parties that, generating a guiding thought and a Great
Leadership, develops the people's war applied to the concrete conditions
of each country; these are true Communist Parties that we must aid in
their constitution or reconstitution, according to the particularities of
each country. he doesn't see that the ideological and political line
decides everything, but focuses on numbers. These are old opportunist
positions that have been crushed since Marx. At bottom, it is a
revisionist position.


Conclusion:

- The document "POLITICAL DECLARATION" of the "First International Seminar
for analysis of the people's war in Peru" spread by the magazine "El
Diario Internacional" is an opportunist document, from the beginning to
the end the text is full of revisionist positions (we point out that we
have only mentioned some "pearls"), that express full convergence with the
lod; 

- The authors of this document put forward capitulation before
imperialism, reaction and revisionism, seeking amnesty and enrollment;

- In a systematic way they attack and try to undermine Chairman Gonzalo
and his almighty thought, the Party and the people's war.

For these reasons, it is the task of every Communist and activist to
denounce, unmask and dynamite these black revisionist positions spread by
the El Diario Internacional and we must do it as part of the two line
struggle to sweep away finally all the convergences with the lod that are
expressed at an international level.


February 2001

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
           THE MAOIST DOCUMENTATION PROJECT
 An archive of revolutionary writings of Marxism, Leninism 
  and Maoism along with today's revolutionary struggles.  
        http://www.maoism.org    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list