[MediaWiki-l] Re: Wiki-Site.com down

This list is for the Mediawiki software itself and has nothing to do with Wiki-Site.com operations. You will have to reach out to Wiki-Site.com for your answers. I know that’s not a great answer here but we unfortunately can’t help. -George Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 19, 2023, at 9:50

[MediaWiki-l] Re: Please reopen these wikis, please.

Bexafe4967 has ignored several explanations that he?s talking to the wrong people.  What?s the list moderation policy???-george Sent from my iPhoneOn Oct 5, 2023, at 4:22 PM, Anpang wrote:?I thought I'd get MW updates and not whatever these are?On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:59 PM

Re: [MediaWiki-l] Permanently remove old revisions and unused files?

Why? Space is rarely an issue... George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Mickey Feldman wrote: > > I have been looking for an extension or process to remove all revisions of > pages "older than _date_" or "all but the last _n_", but have

Re: [MediaWiki-l] A spammer is monitoring this mail list

If it was a link to a .ly URL, those are a virus hacking people's PCs and mailing address books, not a spammer lurking... On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Al Johnson alj62...@yahoo.com wrote: I just got spammed with the email impostering another user of this forum I recently exchanged email

Re: [MediaWiki-l] Apache going nuts and eating all memory

On Oct 30, 2012, at 12:12 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 October 2012 23:56, Dave Humphrey d...@uesp.net wrote: As a rough guess at what to set MaxClients to use top and look at the difference between the RES and SHR columns of all httpd processes. I believe this is

Re: [MediaWiki-l] What to do with an overstressed server?

As one option... On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: So second thing we need to work out what our next stage of evolution is (the 8GB Linode for $200/mo more? [2] or multiple servers? Not really knowledgeable in this area but 200/month does seem a tad

Re: [MediaWiki-l] system requirements for small site?

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, anots...@fastmail.fm wrote: I know https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installation_requirements... Let's say I have 20 medium sized wiki pages. Medium sized defined by wikipedia definitions, normal articles, not too much. I expect having 10 to 100 viewers

Re: [Mediawiki-l] FW: Issue with Wiki site and databases?

On first inspection - I think that something went wrong with your database, and its lost some data. The software can connect to it, but the MediaWiki data doesn't seem to be in it. Check your MySQL database and see if it got corrupted or dropped data... On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jack

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Email configuration

To explain briefly - MediaWiki uses what's known as a mail server - either a local or remote server which will accept server to server email connections. This is completely unlike Gmail or Hotmail or those things - those are mail clients you use, to access someone else's server. Your ISP would

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Benefits of using wiki in a corporate environment-how to convience?

On the followup question - yes. You need to have the landing pad main page visible to anyone, but you can create a group memberships structure with a custom group that keeps anyone from accessing content unless you approve them. That isn't super-secure, but gets you reasonably far towards a

Re: [Mediawiki-l] hard disk crash: try to recover the wiki. (Mediawiki 1.9.3 mysql)

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:38:17 +0200, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:   Uwe Brauer wrote:   most of the  files are very small in size with the   exception of searchindex.MYD and searchindex.MYI. I   have no idea

Re: [Mediawiki-l] hard disk crash: try to recover the wiki. (Mediawiki 1.9.3 mysql)

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote: Hello This is a real nightmare. A Mac crashed, the hard disk could be saved. Right now it can't be booted. That hard disk contained the wiki of our department. I don't know precisely the version of the OS (most likely

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Restricted Area(s)

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 August 2010 17:54, Graham tolli...@dal.ca wrote: So I guess there isn't any possibility to have a group of users assigned to a Namespace, and the other users status quo. The owner of the wiki doesn't want another

Re: [Mediawiki-l] High Availability mediawiki

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henny Savenije webmas...@henny-savenije.pe.kr wrote: No but if you have two servers and on both servers the wiki is under the same domain name the only thing you have to do is regularly copy all the files and databases to the other server (not in use) if one

Re: [Mediawiki-l] centos RPM

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Robert Hagens rhag...@envysion.com wrote: Are there special semantics associated with a user name such that if there is an at sign, mediawiki assumes different properties about the user? For example, if I have a user 'a...@b.c' and I try to edit that user's

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Squid 3.0 configs

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Thornton andrew.thorn...@thorntonindustries.com wrote: Does anyone have a squid 3.0 configuration file that they would not mind sharing? With round robin? (not a config file, but...) If you're going to use it at all, use 3.0-STABLE11 at least - there's

Re: [Mediawiki-l] Unable to upload XLS [was:(no subject)]

The file type is .xlsx rather than .xls, that might help... -george On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Dave Sigafoos davesigaf...@sanmar.comwrote: That is probably it. How would it be set for 1.10? DSig David Tod Sigafoos | SANMAR Corporation -Original Message- From:

Re: [Mediawiki-l] How can I specify 'locked to editing' blocks of pages?

Transcluded pages, and locked transclusion sources, do this just fine. If you control the server you can set up a group security mechanism and put the auto-generated pages in their own namespace, which only a few users can edit, so you don't even have to mess with per-page permission stuff...