Even though I have grown fairly weary of this discussion, I have to
interject that I dislike having my words turned around on me:
Rick S said I cannot give a short
pat answer. As for me trying to prove some subjective proof to you
through objective means, I doubt that I could. They are
interesting that so many think war can go away just like that...do
people really believe that? I know this little note is a spoof, but in
a global society how can we Not police the planet? that is like
letting the guy down the street corner beat the shit out of his wife
and kids in his front yard
Ok, so do you view gravity as subjective?
J.
“Red is a word used to refer to a light wavelength of about 650 nm.
Whether you can see it or not or whether it looks purple to you does
not change the wavelength. We use different words to refer to
different wavelengths for simplicity sake.
Hi y'all - I think Crotchbow is appealing. I don't agree with the
article posted by Aaron. The CFA definition is fine with me. Of
course, if we accept a theist as being a true believer and not just
someone who attends church for social reasons etc. then they are not
practicing freethought as
I'm warning you two firestarters! I will start posting under another name
again...
you'd better *THINK *about the consequences buddy! I know other ways to
get even...wroohahahahah!
[?]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - I think Crotchbow is
Rick S said If I had meant faith I would've said faith
AND I have to
interject that I dislike having my words turned around on me:
Why did you not just say FAITH. It would have saved us time. Yet you
choose to use filler words. Like I have said before to a close Fundy
friend, if you want
I do agree with the article in respect to all atheists
not being freethinkers - some are just too lazy to think.
Clogtowner
Yea, that would be me. But I think I am free to not think so if I am not a
freethinker I am a freenonthinker. I am still a damn atheist which everyone
should
Crossbow is Lana.
J.
I'm warning you two firestarters! I will start posting under another name
again...
you'd better THINK about the consequences buddy! I know other ways to get
even...wroohahahahah!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(mailto:[EMAIL
Hi y'all - sorry I'm a bit late on this and that's no lie.
Define truth
Here's a definition that I like: The conformity of a proposition to
the way things are. Precise analysis of the nature of truth is the
subject of the correspondence, coherence, pragmatic, redundancy, and
semantic theories of
I think that peace (unity) can be achieved in only two different ways:
1. Agreement
2. Force
“Hardwired” or not, these are our choices.
Also, saying that “…but in a global society how can we Not police the
planet? …”, suggests that ‘we’ have been given that right/power. I
know that ‘W’ believes
I believe that the technical term for Blowselfus is autofellatio.
J.
OK Crotchblow. How 'bout Crotchus de Blowselfus? Would that work?
stemcell
On Oct 28, 11:12 am, CrossBow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm warning you two firestarters! I will start posting under another name
Hi y'all - I'll have to wait until later as the training is a
difficult time for me, and I'd have to miss the next debate as I'll be
out of the country. I'll check their schedule for the next training
event when I get back.
On Oct 28, 11:25 am, Isparklaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This link
Ok, so do you view gravity as subjective? - J.
As a word and a concept, of course!
On Oct 28, 7:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so do you view gravity as subjective?
J.
“Red is a word used to refer to a light wavelength of about 650 nm.
Whether you can see it or not or whether it
On Oct 28, 4:06 am, ornamentalmind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
“Red is a word used to refer to a light wavelength of about 650 nm.
Whether you can see it or not or whether it looks purple to you does
not change the wavelength. We use different words to refer to
different wavelengths for
WE is inclusive of countries responsible for global survival by nature
of position of influence -money, location, etc. Of course ideally, carefully
wrought vice-grip sanctions, or smart military maneuverings, should be
priority, not horsehockey as practiced by the Bush Brigade, who I think all
I am not Lana.
blowyourself StemCell!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*I believe that the technical term for Blowselfus is autofellatio.*
*J.*
OK Crotchblow. How 'bout Crotchus de Blowselfus? Would that work?
stemcell
On Oct 28, 11:12 am, CrossBow [EMAIL
“Please elaborate on these claims.” – BC
“His description appears to be right on the mark.” – BC
First, I’ll agree that the description appears to be on the mark.
Underline the term ‘appears’. That is my point.
I’m talking about appearances in a philosophical way, something you
may not have had
That got a huge smile and a burst of laughter! funny! I do share a common
trait or two.. specifically the little horns that stick out the sides of my
skull..[?]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - I can vouch for the fact that Xcurtsy is not Lana
Clogtowner is Lana.
J.
In a message dated 10/28/2008 2:04:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi y'all - I can vouch for the fact that Xcurtsy is not Lana
On Oct 28, 12:49 pm, CrossBow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not Lana.
blowyourself StemCell!
On Tue,
I'll have to get Clogtowner to translate all that into red neckover a beer.
J.
“Please elaborate on these claims.” – BC
“His description appears to be right on the mark.” – BC
First, I’ll agree that the description appears to be on the mark.
Underline the term ‘appears’. That is my
*NO, ITS YOU!!!* don't anybody tell him, let him figure it out...it's not
important really.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Clogtowner is Lana.*
**
*J.*
In a message dated 10/28/2008 2:04:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi y'all - I
Sorry, didn't mean to include your entire post! I also 'Replied' to a
different post of yours. Mad Cow?
On Oct 28, 12:23 pm, ornamentalmind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WE is inclusive of countries responsible for global survival by nature
of position of influence -money, location, etc. Of course
I thought he gave a good example of how a theist could be a
freethinker. Surely it deserves more in the way of a rebuttal than I
disagree. Why do you disagree?
On Oct 28, 10:55 am, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - I think Crotchbow is appealing. I don't agree with the
article
Since there is much 'serious' chat here including discussions about
war, argumentation, futility and nausea in general and as much as I
appreciate all mental states, an occasional post to reestablish
equilibrium is called for.
Here is one to lighten the mood. While it is easy to argue with it’s
Thanks, very Idealistic and welcome at the end of a long day;)
[?][?]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:35 PM, ornamentalmind [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Since there is much 'serious' chat here including discussions about
war, argumentation, futility and nausea in general and as much as I
appreciate
And elaborate on the pseudoscientific claim as well.
-BC-
On Oct 28, 12:35 pm, ornamentalmind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
“Please elaborate on these claims.” – BC
“His description appears to be right on the mark.” – BC
First, I’ll agree that the description appears to be on the mark.
Clog, are you sure you read the same essay? I don't see a connection
between what you wrote and anything Lowder proposed. Why shouldn't
the the theist described in the essay be considered a freethinker?
On Oct 28, 4:07 pm, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - sorry, my replies tend
Hi y'all - thanks for asking. I have been working on this stuff for
some time and I believe I'm close to a breakthrough but.
Anyway, Heisenberg just doesn't cut it for me. He handles the momentum
and location OK. and then he makes a basic mistake by assuming the act
of measurement (no matter
Hi y'all - yes I've read it. In the first paragraph he poses the
question Can a theist be a freethinker? He answers Yes, but I
answer No for my given reasons. Reading Swinburne doesn't change a
person's faith. In the second paragraph he lists the CFA definition of
freethought which I agree with.
“… as for being bombastic and prone to hyperbole...well, this is a
public forum and we all have personalities and I
will not apologize for mine as repugnant as it may get.” – CB
Ditto!!!
“…it is extremely lovably niaive to imagine we can know all the cards
and players in this international
*** starts pumping up his erect upright organ for the music ***
On Oct 28, 2:24 pm, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - yes it is easy to argue with the content, so I won't but I
do wish these modern movie makers would improve their presentation.
Far from being turned on by ear
Aaron said Surely it deserves more in the way of a rebuttal than
I
disagree. Why do you disagree?
I agree.
stemcell
On Oct 28, 3:21 pm, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought he gave a good example of how a theist could be a
freethinker. Surely it deserves more in the way of a
That's right, but the Civil War was about States not, as Jason argued,
about individuals. And since the Civil War is an example (hopefully
the last example) of a Constitutional question being decided with
military conflict, it is important to point out what the decision
was: The Constitution
Hi y'all - facts is facts is facts. I hate to bring race into this but
we live in the South. When I moved here we had a white Sheriff and
he told me what to do with the body. I'm not saying that evidence
would not be available, I'm saying that he made it clear that evidence
would not be
Atheism is not a prerequisite. It is a conclusion.
Freethought is a way of deciding what is probably true and what
probably isn't. It is precisely *because* we want to believe true
things that we consider knowledge to be tentative and subject to
further evidence.
The fact that we can't
http://michaelpalinforpresident.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Memphis Freethought Alliance group.
To post to this group, send email to memphisfreethoughtalliance@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
That's all well and good, but it seems beside the point. Consider
this syllogism:
Freethought is the use of logic, reason and evidence instead of
tradition, emotion or dogma to determine beliefs. Han Solo determines
his beliefs (including his belief in God) using logic, reason and
evidence
I always thought he was the sexiest of the Monty Python boys. Too bad
I already voted. I might have written him in!
Aaron
On Oct 29, 12:13 am, Jason (Memphis) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://michaelpalinforpresident.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
38 matches
Mail list logo
