http://www.brasschecktv.com:80/page/465.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Memphis Freethought Alliance group.
To post to this group, send email to memphisfreethoughtalliance@googlegroups.com
To
Hi y'all - the machine that I voted on a couple of weeks ago was more
primitive than an amstrad comupter that I owned in the late 70s. As I
have no paper print out - even an ATM machine can do that - I have no
proof of vote. In UK ( don't know if this is still the case) a paper
ballot was used.
my first computer was an amstrad. I had forgotten the name of it. 640
K of ram. It had a 20mb hard drive. And I would prefer that to
anything by Diebold.
Rick S
On Oct 31, 1:20 pm, Clogtowner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi y'all - the machine that I voted on a couple of weeks ago was more
... I think the desire for instant results if fuelling the problem.
- clog
Uhhh, perhaps FIXED instant results...but, for decades exit polls were
found to be quite scientific and amazingly accurate. They only fell
out of favor after the first ‘W’ selection where what the voting
machines said
