bleh, you're right
So we should not be using DCC ...
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:37 PM Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
>
> It's already disabled later in this function?
>
> On 7/25/19 4:34 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > (a) radv does not set the DCC fields required yet.
> > (b) radeonsi just broke
It's already disabled later in this function?
On 7/25/19 4:34 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
(a) radv does not set the DCC fields required yet.
(b) radeonsi just broke their DCC metadata.
Fixes: f8b6c5a1a63 "radeonsi: rewrite si_get_opaque_metadata, also for gfx10
support"
---
(a) radv does not set the DCC fields required yet.
(b) radeonsi just broke their DCC metadata.
Fixes: f8b6c5a1a63 "radeonsi: rewrite si_get_opaque_metadata, also for gfx10
support"
---
src/amd/vulkan/radv_image.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_image.c
