On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 16:02 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 at 18:23, Juan A. Suarez Romero
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:41 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > - In Wayland/Mesa, the surface is not resized at the time the native
> > > > window is
> > > >
Hi Juan,
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 at 18:23, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:41 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > - In Wayland/Mesa, the surface is not resized at the time the native
> > > window is
> > > resized; this is done in *eglSwapBuffers*, following 3.10.1.1.
> >
> >
On Tue, 05 Jun 2018 19:22:47 +0200
"Juan A. Suarez Romero" wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:41 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi Juan,
> >
> > On 5 June 2018 at 09:51, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > Yes, that's
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 19:36 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Throwing a small suggestion here:
>
> Once a consensus is reached, do add some beefy comments inline. Mostly
> of any parts that are different from the X11/GBM/other backends.
> A reference to this thread might also be a
Hi everyone,
Throwing a small suggestion here:
Once a consensus is reached, do add some beefy comments inline. Mostly
of any parts that are different from the X11/GBM/other backends.
A reference to this thread might also be a good idea.
Thanks
Emil
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:41 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On 5 June 2018 at 09:51, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > The first query will correctly return (w1,h1). The second query will
> > > incorrectly also return (w1,h1),
Hi Juan,
On 5 June 2018 at 09:51, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> The first query will correctly return (w1,h1). The second query will
>> incorrectly also return (w1,h1), even though the surface will never
>> have that size. The third
On 05.06.2018 11:51, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Juan,
On 4 June 2018 at 12:43, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 16:32 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
I think you're right, and this needs more rework to be consistent.
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:22 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On 4 June 2018 at 12:43, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 16:32 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > I think you're right, and this needs more rework to be consistent.
> > >
> > >
Hi Juan,
On 4 June 2018 at 12:43, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 16:32 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> I think you're right, and this needs more rework to be consistent.
>>
>> wl_egl_window_get_attached_size() always returns the size of the last
>> attached buffer (if there
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 16:32 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1 June 2018 at 15:35, Brendan King wrote:
> > IMG has a similar patch to the one you describe, but without the changes to
> > the resize_callback, so just this bit:
> >
> > @@ -255,6 +257,12 @@
When creating a windows surface with eglCreateWindowSurface(), the
width and height returned by eglQuerySurface(EGL_{WIDTH,HEIGHT}) is
invalid until buffers are updated (like calling glClear()).
But according to EGL 1.5 spec, section 3.5.6 ("Surface Attributes"):
"Querying EGL_WIDTH and
Hi,
On 1 June 2018 at 15:35, Brendan King wrote:
> IMG has a similar patch to the one you describe, but without the changes to
> the resize_callback, so just this bit:
>
> @@ -255,6 +257,12 @@ dri2_wl_create_window_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
> _EGLDisplay *disp,
>goto cleanup_surf;
> }
On 01/06/18 12:09, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 11:23 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 1 June 2018 at 09:47, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
My question then: is mandatory to call eglSwapBuffers() to ensure
wl_egl_window_get_attached_size() returns the right window size?
On 01/06/18 12:09, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 11:23 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 1 June 2018 at 09:47, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
My question then: is mandatory to call eglSwapBuffers() to ensure
wl_egl_window_get_attached_size() returns the right window size?
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 11:23 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1 June 2018 at 09:47, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > My question then: is mandatory to call eglSwapBuffers() to ensure
> > wl_egl_window_get_attached_size() returns the right window size? Because I
> > found nothing related
Hi,
On 1 June 2018 at 09:47, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> My question then: is mandatory to call eglSwapBuffers() to ensure
> wl_egl_window_get_attached_size() returns the right window size? Because I
> found nothing related about this. If it is mandatory, then calling
> eglSwapBuffers() in
The IMG patch Eric was referring to was to dEQP. I submitted bug reports
to Google and Khronos:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/64059452
https://gitlab.khronos.org/Tracker/vk-gl-cts/issues/594
I've attached the patch to this email. The problem is that the dEQP
*resize.surface_size*
The IMG patch Eric was referring to was to dEQP. I submitted bug reports
to both Google and Khronos:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/64059452
https://gitlab.khronos.org/Tracker/vk-gl-cts/issues/594
I've attached the patch to this email. The problem is that the dEQP
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 09:39 +0100, Brendan King wrote:
> The IMG patch Eric was referring to was to dEQP. I submitted bug
> reports to Google and Khronos:
>
> https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/64059452
>
> https://gitlab.khronos.org/Tracker/vk-gl-cts/issues/594
>
>
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 17:24 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 17:13, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2018-05-31 16:57:17 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Not initialising attached_{width,height} should not cause any problems
> > > with these checks. By definition
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 16:57 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> Thanks for picking this up!
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 16:44, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > @@ -255,6 +257,12 @@ dri2_wl_create_window_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
> > _EGLDisplay *disp,
> >goto cleanup_surf;
> > }
> >
>
Hi Eric,
On 31 May 2018 at 17:13, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Thursday, 2018-05-31 16:57:17 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Not initialising attached_{width,height} should not cause any problems
>> with these checks. By definition there cannot have been any buffers
>> allocated or attached between
On Thursday, 2018-05-31 16:57:17 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> Thanks for picking this up!
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 16:44, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > @@ -255,6 +257,12 @@ dri2_wl_create_window_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
> > _EGLDisplay *disp,
> >goto cleanup_surf;
> > }
>
Hi Juan,
Thanks for picking this up!
On 31 May 2018 at 16:44, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> @@ -255,6 +257,12 @@ dri2_wl_create_window_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
> _EGLDisplay *disp,
>goto cleanup_surf;
> }
>
> + dri2_surf->base.Width = window->width;
> + dri2_surf->base.Height =
When creating a windows surface with eglCreatesWindowSurface(), the
width and height returned by eglQuerySurface(EGL_{WIDTH,HEIGHT}) is
invalid until buffers are updated (like calling glClear()).
Likewise, on top of above resizing the Wayland window and quering again
the surface size, returns the
26 matches
Mail list logo
